Capital Punishment in America
Смертная казнь в Америке
2012-10-22
SCID: 54.1/gb4cc579
Discuss with AI
capital punishmentdeath penaltydeterrent effectlife imprisonmentwrongful execution
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Paternoster reviews the history of execution in the US, the laws concerning capital punishment, and the arguments for and against the death penalty. He shows that the cost of executing a prisoner may actually be higher than jailing him for life, and that capital punishment as a deterrant is ineffective. Life imprisonment, he argues, without the possibility of parole and with mandatory restitution to the victim's family is a more effective policy than the death penalty. This sentence punishes the criminal, protects the public, save the taxpayer money and may ease the financial suffering of the victim's survivors. More importantly, such a policy would ensure that the goverment does not execute innocent people.
Key Findings
1
Capital punishment is assessed as ineffective as a deterrent to crime.
2
Life imprisonment avoids the risk of executing innocent people, a danger inherent in capital punishment.
3
Life imprisonment without parole, combined with mandatory restitution, is argued to punish offenders and protect the public more effectively.
4
The proposed alternative could reduce taxpayer costs and ease the financial burden on victims’ survivors.
5
The review finds that executing a prisoner may cost more than imposing life imprisonment.
Research Object
Capital punishment in the United States
Research Subject
The history, legal framework, costs, deterrent effectiveness, and policy implications of capital punishment compared with life imprisonment
Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-10-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest