Capital Punishment in America

Смертная казнь в Америке
2012-10-22

capital punishmentdeath penaltydeterrent effectlife imprisonmentwrongful execution
Paternoster reviews the history of execution in the US, the laws concerning capital punishment, and the arguments for and against the death penalty. He shows that the cost of executing a prisoner may actually be higher than jailing him for life, and that capital punishment as a deterrant is ineffective. Life imprisonment, he argues, without the possibility of parole and with mandatory restitution to the victim's family is a more effective policy than the death penalty. This sentence punishes the criminal, protects the public, save the taxpayer money and may ease the financial suffering of the victim's survivors. More importantly, such a policy would ensure that the goverment does not execute innocent people.
1
Capital punishment is assessed as ineffective as a deterrent to crime.
2
Life imprisonment avoids the risk of executing innocent people, a danger inherent in capital punishment.
3
Life imprisonment without parole, combined with mandatory restitution, is argued to punish offenders and protect the public more effectively.
4
The proposed alternative could reduce taxpayer costs and ease the financial burden on victims’ survivors.
5
The review finds that executing a prisoner may cost more than imposing life imprisonment.

Capital punishment in the United States

The history, legal framework, costs, deterrent effectiveness, and policy implications of capital punishment compared with life imprisonment

Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-10-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%