International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity

Международная анкета физической активности: надежность и валидность в 12 странах
Barbara E. Ainsworth, Adrian Bauman, James F. Sallis, Cora L. Craig, Alison L. Marshall, M Sj str m, Michael Booth, Michael Pratt, Ulf Ekelund, Agneta Yngve, Pekka Oja, MICHAEL SJ??STR??M
2003-08-01

IPAQ long formIPAQ short form (last 7 d recall)International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)criterion validity (accelerometer/CSA/MTI, median rho ~0.30)reliability (test-retest, Spearman's rho ~0.8)
BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a global concern, but diverse physical activity measures in use prevent international comparisons. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed as an instrument for cross-national monitoring of physical activity and inactivity. METHODS: Between 1997 and 1998, an International Consensus Group developed four long and four short forms of the IPAQ instruments (administered by telephone interview or self-administration, with two alternate reference periods, either the "last 7 d" or a "usual week" of recalled physical activity). During 2000, 14 centers from 12 countries collected reliability and/or validity data on at least two of the eight IPAQ instruments. Test-retest repeatability was assessed within the same week. Concurrent (inter-method) validity was assessed at the same administration, and criterion IPAQ validity was assessed against the CSA (now MTI) accelerometer. Spearman's correlation coefficients are reported, based on the total reported physical activity. RESULTS: Overall, the IPAQ questionnaires produced repeatable data (Spearman's rho clustered around 0.8), with comparable data from short and long forms. Criterion validity had a median rho of about 0.30, which was comparable to most other self-report validation studies. The "usual week" and "last 7 d" reference periods performed similarly, and the reliability of telephone administration was similar to the self-administered mode. CONCLUSIONS: The IPAQ instruments have acceptable measurement properties, at least as good as other established self-reports. Considering the diverse samples in this study, IPAQ has reasonable measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity among 18- to 65-yr-old adults in diverse settings. The short IPAQ form "last 7 d recall" is recommended for national monitoring and the long form for research requiring more detailed assessment.
1
Criterion validity of IPAQ against the CSA/MTI accelerometer had a median Spearman's rho of about 0.30, comparable to other self-report validation studies.
2
IPAQ has acceptable measurement properties for monitoring physical activity among 18- to 65-year-old adults in diverse international settings.
3
Recommendation: use the short IPAQ form with "last 7 d recall" for national monitoring and the long form for research needing more detailed assessment.
4
Short and long IPAQ forms produced comparable repeatability data across administrations.
5
Telephone-administered IPAQ reliability was similar to self-administered mode.
6
The "usual week" and "last 7 d" reference periods performed similarly in reliability and validity.
7
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) instruments showed high test-retest repeatability, with Spearman's rho clustered around 0.8.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) instruments (four long and four short forms, administered by telephone or self-report, with 'last 7 d' or 'usual week' reference periods)

Reliability and validity (test–retest repeatability, inter-method concurrent validity, and criterion validity against accelerometer) of the IPAQ for measuring total reported physical activity in adults

Publication Details
Publication Date
2003-08-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Barbara E. Ainsworth
Adrian Bauman
James F. Sallis
Cora L. Craig
Alison L. Marshall
M Sj str m
Michael Booth
Michael Pratt
Ulf Ekelund
Agneta Yngve
Pekka Oja
MICHAEL SJ??STR??M
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%