Prophylactic Mesh Application during Colostomy to Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Meta-Analysis
Профилактическое применение сетчатого имплантата при наложении колостомы для предотвращения парастомальной грыжи: метаанализ
2016-01-01
SCID: 54.1/gghm4gcu
Discuss with AI
meta-analysisparastomal herniapermanent colostomyprophylactic meshrandomized controlled trials
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Background. Parastomal hernia is a common complication after stoma formation, especially in permanent colostomy. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh application during permanent colostomy for preventing parastomal hernia. Methods. Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes in patients who underwent colostomy with or without prophylactic mesh application were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Libraries. Results. This meta-analysis included 8 randomized controlled trials with 522 participants. Our pooled results showed that prophylactic mesh application (mesh group) reduced the incidence of clinically detected parastomal hernia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.38; P<0.00001 ), radiologically detected parastomal hernia (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.47–0.82; P=0.0008 ), and surgical repair for herniation (RR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.14–0.83; P=0.02 ) when compared with conventional permanent colostomy formation (control group). The incidence of complications, including wound infection, peristomal infection, mesh infection, stomal necrosis and stenosis, stoma site pain, and fistula, was not higher in the mesh group than in the control group. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that prophylactic mesh application at the time of primary colostomy formation is a promising method for the prevention of parastomal herniation.
Key Findings
1
A meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 522 participants evaluated prophylactic mesh during permanent colostomy formation.
2
Mesh application did not increase reported complications, including infections, stomal necrosis or stenosis, pain, and fistula.
3
Mesh placement reduced radiologically detected parastomal hernia incidence (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.47–0.82).
4
Prophylactic mesh reduced the need for surgical repair of parastomal herniation (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.14–0.83).
5
Prophylactic mesh significantly reduced clinically detected parastomal hernia incidence compared with conventional colostomy (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.13–0.38).
Research Object
permanent colostomy with prophylactic mesh application
Research Subject
effectiveness of prophylactic mesh application in preventing parastomal hernia and hernia-related surgical repair without increasing complications
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest