Prophylactic Mesh Application during Colostomy to Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Meta-Analysis

Профилактическое применение сетчатого имплантата при наложении колостомы для предотвращения парастомальной грыжи: метаанализ
Junjia Zhu, Yuwei Pu, Xiaodong Yang, DeBao Zhang, Kui Zhao, Wei Peng, Chungen Xing
2016-01-01

meta-analysisparastomal herniapermanent colostomyprophylactic meshrandomized controlled trials
Background. Parastomal hernia is a common complication after stoma formation, especially in permanent colostomy. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh application during permanent colostomy for preventing parastomal hernia. Methods. Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes in patients who underwent colostomy with or without prophylactic mesh application were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Libraries. Results. This meta-analysis included 8 randomized controlled trials with 522 participants. Our pooled results showed that prophylactic mesh application (mesh group) reduced the incidence of clinically detected parastomal hernia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.38; P<0.00001 ), radiologically detected parastomal hernia (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.47–0.82; P=0.0008 ), and surgical repair for herniation (RR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.14–0.83; P=0.02 ) when compared with conventional permanent colostomy formation (control group). The incidence of complications, including wound infection, peristomal infection, mesh infection, stomal necrosis and stenosis, stoma site pain, and fistula, was not higher in the mesh group than in the control group. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that prophylactic mesh application at the time of primary colostomy formation is a promising method for the prevention of parastomal herniation.
1
A meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 522 participants evaluated prophylactic mesh during permanent colostomy formation.
2
Mesh application did not increase reported complications, including infections, stomal necrosis or stenosis, pain, and fistula.
3
Mesh placement reduced radiologically detected parastomal hernia incidence (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.47–0.82).
4
Prophylactic mesh reduced the need for surgical repair of parastomal herniation (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.14–0.83).
5
Prophylactic mesh significantly reduced clinically detected parastomal hernia incidence compared with conventional colostomy (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.13–0.38).

permanent colostomy with prophylactic mesh application

effectiveness of prophylactic mesh application in preventing parastomal hernia and hernia-related surgical repair without increasing complications

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Junjia Zhu
Yuwei Pu
Xiaodong Yang
DeBao Zhang
Kui Zhao
Wei Peng
Chungen Xing
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%