Evaluation of speckle filtering and texture analysis methods for land cover classification from SAR images
Оценка методов подавления засветки и анализа текстуры для классификации покрытий земли по РСИ
2002-01-01
SCID: 54.1/gm9jh32s
Discuss with AI
Jeffreys-Matusita distanceKHAT statisticSAR imagesland cover classificationmaximum-likelihoodmulti-layer perceptronradial basis functionspeckle reductiontexture analysiswavelet transform
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This paper describes a comparative evaluation of several speckle reduction and texture analysis techniques, with particular emphasis on their applicability to supervised land cover classification from SAR images. Issues related to suppression of speckle in a uniform area, preservation of edges, and texture preservation are pursued in these filters. Quality of texture features is measured by the relevancy, discriminative power and ease of computation of the features. The discriminative power of texture features is measured using the Jeffreys-Matusita distance and classification performance measured on a validation set independent from the classifier's training set. Classifiers investigated are maximum-likelihood, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) neural networks. Classification accuracy is measured by KHAT statistic calculated from confusion matrices. Two SAR images of ERS-1 and E-SAR programme showing different land cover categories within the regions of Douala and Ngaoundere (Cameroon), and a bi-polarized Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) image from an agricultural station near the city of Altona (Canada) are used for analysis. Speckle suppression techniques based on the wavelet transform performs the best, followed by the modified K-nearest neighbours and the Lee's local statistic filters. Depending on the nature of the land cover types being classified, texture features derived from second- and third-order histogram performed the best, followed by first-order statistics and features derived using the grey-level difference vector method. Among all classifiers considered, the MLP and the RBF neural networks performed the best, achieving up to 94% overall accuracy for the E-SAR image of Douala, for example.
Key Findings
1
Discriminative power of texture features was quantified using Jeffreys-Matusita distance and classification accuracy was assessed with KHAT statistic on independent validation sets.
2
MLP and RBF neural network classifiers achieved the highest classification performance, reaching up to 94% overall accuracy on the E-SAR Douala image.
3
Modified K-nearest neighbours and Lee's local statistic filters were the next-best speckle suppression methods after wavelet filtering.
4
Texture features from second- and third-order histograms were most effective for classification depending on land cover types, outperforming first-order and grey-level difference vector features.
5
Wavelet-transform-based speckle suppression techniques produced the best performance among filters evaluated for SAR land cover classification.
Research Object
Speckle reduction and texture analysis methods applied to SAR images for supervised land cover classification
Research Subject
Their effectiveness for supervised land cover classification from SAR images, measured via speckle suppression (uniform-area smoothing, edge and texture preservation), quality and discriminative power of texture features, and classification accuracy across classifiers
Publication Details
Publication Date
2002-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest