An Overview of Currently Applied Ferrochrome Production Processes and Their Waste Management Practices

Обзор применяемых в настоящее время процессов производства феррохрома и практик управления отходами
Dmitri Bessarabov, S.P. du Preez, Tristan P. M. van Kaam, Eli Ringdalen, Merete Tangstad, Kazuki Morita, Pieter G. van Zyl, Johan P. Beukes
2023-06-13

CO-rich off-gas energy recoveryferrochrome productionhexavalent chromium (Cr(VI))hydrogen-based reduction of chromitewaste management practices
Ferrochrome (FeCr) is the main source of virgin chromium (Cr) units used in modern-day chromium (Cr) containing alloys. The vast majority of produced Cr is used during the production of stainless steel, which owes its corrosion resistance mainly to the presence of Cr. In turn, stainless steel is mainly produced from Cr-containing scrap metal and FeCr, which is a relatively crude alloy between iron (Fe) and Cr. The production of FeCr is an energy and material-intensive process, and a relatively wide variety of by-products, typically classified as waste materials by the FeCr industry, are created during FeCr production. The type and extent of waste generation are dictated by the smelting route used and the management practices thereof employed by a specific smelter. In some cases, waste management of hazardous and non-hazardous materials may be classified as insufficient. Hazardous materials, such as hexavalent Cr, i.e., Cr(VI), -containing wastes, are only partially mitigated. Additionally, energy-containing wastes, such as carbon monoxide (CO)-rich off-gas, are typically discarded, and energy-invested materials, such as fine oxidative sintered chromite, are either stockpiled or sold as ordinary chromite. In cases where low-value containing wastes are generated, such as rejects from ore beneficiation processes, consistent and efficient processes are either difficult to employ or the return on investment of such processes is not economically viable. More so, the development of less carbon (C)-intensive (e.g., partial replacement of C reductants) and low-temperature pellet curing processes are currently not considered by the South African FeCr smelting industry. The reasoning for this is mainly due to increased operation costs (if improved waste management were to be implemented/higher cost reductants were used) and a lack of research initiatives. These reasons result in the stagnation of technologies. From an environmental point of view, smelting industries are pressured to reduce C emissions. An attractive approach for removing oxygen from the target metal oxides, and the mitigation of gaseous C, is by using hydrogen as a reductant. By doing so, water vapor is the only by-product. It is however expected that stable metal oxides, such as the Cr-oxide present in chromite, will be significantly more resistive to gaseous hydrogen-based reduction when compared to Fe-oxides. In this review, the various processes currently used by the South African FeCr industry are summarized in detail, and the waste materials per process step are identified. The limitations of current waste management regimes and possible alternative routes are discussed where applicable. Various management regimes are identified that could be improved, i.e., by utilizing the energy associated with CO-rich off-gas combustion, employing a low-temperature alternative chromite pelletization process, and considering the potential of hydrogen as a chromite reductant. These identified regimes are discussed in further detail, and alterative processes/approaches to waste management are proposed.
1
Energy-containing wastes (e.g., CO-rich off-gas) are typically discarded rather than utilized for energy recovery in South African FeCr plants.
2
Energy-invested materials (e.g., fine oxidative sintered chromite) are commonly stockpiled or sold as ordinary chromite instead of being recycled effectively.
3
Ferrochrome (FeCr) production generates a wide variety of by-products and wastes whose type and extent depend on the smelting route and management practices.
4
Hazardous wastes containing hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) are only partially mitigated under current FeCr waste management practices.
5
Hydrogen reduction is proposed as an attractive low-carbon alternative because it yields water vapor, but Cr-oxides (chromite) are expected to be significantly more resistant to hydrogen reduction than Fe-oxides.
6
Low-value wastes from ore beneficiation are difficult to process consistently or are not economically viable to recover, limiting practical waste valorization.
7
Potential improvements include combusting CO-rich off-gas for energy recovery, implementing low-temperature chromite pelletization, and exploring hydrogen as a chromite reductant.
8
South African FeCr industry has not adopted less carbon-intensive measures (e.g., partial replacement of carbon reductants, low-temperature pellet curing) mainly due to higher operational costs and lack of research.

Ferrochrome (FeCr) production processes used by the South African smelting industry

Waste generation and waste-management practices across FeCr production steps, including types of wastes (hazardous Cr(VI), CO-rich off-gas, sintered chromite fines, beneficiation rejects), limitations of current regimes, and potential alternative mitigation routes (CO energy recovery, low-temperature pelletization, hydrogen-based reduction)

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-06-13
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
51
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Dmitri Bessarabov
S.P. du Preez
Tristan P. M. van Kaam
Eli Ringdalen
Merete Tangstad
Kazuki Morita
Pieter G. van Zyl
Johan P. Beukes
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%