Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor

К пониманию влияния искусственного интеллекта на труд
Morgan R. Frank, David Autor, James Bessen, Erik Brynjolfsson, Manuel Cebrián, David Deming, Maryann P. Feldman, Matthew Groh, José Lobo, Esteban Moro, Dashun Wang, Hyejin Youn, Iyad Rahwan
2019-03-25

artificial intelligencehuman-machine complementaritylabor marketsskill substitutiontechnological unemployment
Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies have the potential to significantly disrupt labor markets. While AI and automation can augment the productivity of some workers, they can replace the work done by others and will likely transform almost all occupations at least to some degree. Rising automation is happening in a period of growing economic inequality, raising fears of mass technological unemployment and a renewed call for policy efforts to address the consequences of technological change. In this paper we discuss the barriers that inhibit scientists from measuring the effects of AI and automation on the future of work. These barriers include the lack of high-quality data about the nature of work (e.g., the dynamic requirements of occupations), lack of empirically informed models of key microlevel processes (e.g., skill substitution and human-machine complementarity), and insufficient understanding of how cognitive technologies interact with broader economic dynamics and institutional mechanisms (e.g., urban migration and international trade policy). Overcoming these barriers requires improvements in the longitudinal and spatial resolution of data, as well as refinements to data on workplace skills. These improvements will enable multidisciplinary research to quantitatively monitor and predict the complex evolution of work in tandem with technological progress. Finally, given the fundamental uncertainty in predicting technological change, we recommend developing a decision framework that focuses on resilience to unexpected scenarios in addition to general equilibrium behavior.
1
AI and automation may augment some workers, replace others, and transform nearly all occupations to some degree.
2
Because technological change is fundamentally uncertain, policy should prioritize resilience to unexpected scenarios alongside conventional general-equilibrium analysis.
3
Growing automation amid rising economic inequality intensifies concerns about mass technological unemployment and motivates policy responses to technological change.
4
Improved longitudinal and spatial data resolution, alongside better workplace-skills data, is needed to quantitatively monitor and predict how work evolves with technological progress.
5
Measuring AI’s labor-market effects is hindered by inadequate data on occupational work requirements, limited models of skill substitution and human–machine complementarity, and insufficient understanding of broader economic and institutional dynamics.

labor markets and occupations undergoing AI-driven automation and technological change

the effects of AI and automation on work, including worker displacement, productivity augmentation, skill substitution, human–machine complementarity, and the evolution of employment

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-03-25
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Morgan R. Frank
David Autor
James Bessen
Erik Brynjolfsson
Manuel Cebrián
David Deming
Maryann P. Feldman
Matthew Groh
José Lobo
Esteban Moro
Dashun Wang
Hyejin Youn
Iyad Rahwan
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%