Palliative care: views of patients and their families.
Паллиативная помощь: мнения пациентов и членов их семей.
1990-08-04
SCID: 54.1/gw6usut2
Discuss with AI
palliative careservice satisfactionsupport teamssymptom controlterminally ill cancer patients
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current problems and needs of terminally ill cancer patients and their family members, and to discover their views of hospital, community, and support team services. DESIGN: Prospective study of patients and families by questionnaire interviews in the patients' homes. SETTING: Inner London and north Kent (London suburbs). SUBJECTS: 65 Patients, each with a member of their family or a career. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratings of eight current problems and ratings and comments on three services-hospital doctors and nurses, general practitioners and district nurses, and the support team staff-obtained after a minimum of two weeks' care from palliative care support teams. RESULTS: Effect of anxiety on the patient's nearest career. and symptom control were rated as the most severe current problems by both patients and families; a few patients and families identified other severe problems. Families' ratings of pain control, symptom control, and effect of anxiety on the patient were significantly worse than the patients' ratings (p less than 0.05). Support teams received the most praise, being rated by 58 (89%) patients and 59 (91%) of family members as good as excellent. General practitioners and district nurses were rated good or excellent by 46 (71%) patients and 46 (71%) family members, but six (9%) in each group rated the service as poor or very bad, and ratings in the inner London district were significantly worse than those in the outer London district. Hospital doctors and nurses were rated good or excellent by 22 (34%) patients and 35 (54%) of family members, and 14 (22%) patients and 15 (23%) family members rated this service as poor or very bad. Negative comments referred to communication (especially at diagnosis), coordination of services, the attitude of the doctor, delays in diagnosis, and difficulties in getting doctors to visit at home. Family members were more satisfied with the services than were patients. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care needs to include both the patient and family because the needs of the family may exceed those of the patient. Support teams and some hospital and community doctors and nurses met the perceived needs of dying patients and families, but better education and organisation of services are needed.
Key Findings
1
Anxiety affecting the patient’s nearest caregiver and symptom control were the most severe problems reported by both patients and families.
2
Families rated pain control, symptom control, and anxiety’s effect on patients significantly worse than patients did themselves (p<0.05).
3
Family members were generally more satisfied with healthcare services than the patients themselves.
4
General practitioners and district nurses were rated good or excellent by 71% of both groups, with significantly worse ratings in inner London than outer London.
5
Hospital doctors and nurses received lower ratings; communication, service coordination, doctor attitudes, diagnostic delays, and difficulty obtaining home visits were common concerns.
6
Palliative care support teams received the highest evaluations, rated good or excellent by 89% of patients and 91% of family members.
Research Object
Terminally ill cancer patients and their family members receiving palliative care services
Research Subject
Their current problems and needs, and their views and satisfaction regarding hospital, community, and palliative care support team services
Publication Details
Publication Date
1990-08-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest