Two-Way Antigenic Cross-Reactivity between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Group 1 Animal CoVs Is Mediated through an Antigenic Site in the N-Terminal Region of the SARS-CoV Nucleoprotein

Двунаправленная антигенная перекрёстная реактивность между коронавирусом тяжёлого острого респираторного синдрома (SARS-CoV) и коронавирусами животных группы 1 опосредуется антигенным участком в N-концевой области нуклеопротеина SARS-CoV
Anastasia N. Vlasova, Xinsheng Zhang, Mustafa Hasöksüz, Hadya S. Nagesha, Lia M. Haynes, Ying Fang, Shan Lu, Linda J. Saif
2007-10-04

SARS-CoV nucleoproteinWestern blot analysisantigenic cross-reactivityenzyme-linked immunosorbent assaygroup 1 animal coronaviruses
In 2002, severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) emerged in humans, causing a global epidemic. By phylogenetic analysis, SARS-CoV is distinct from known CoVs and most closely related to group 2 CoVs. However, no antigenic cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV and known CoVs was conclusively and consistently demonstrated except for group 1 animal CoVs. We analyzed this cross-reactivity by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot analysis using specific antisera to animal CoVs and SARS-CoV and SARS patient convalescent-phase or negative sera. Moderate two-way cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV and porcine CoVs (transmissible gastroenteritis CoV [TGEV] and porcine respiratory CoV [PRCV]) was mediated through the N but not the spike protein, whereas weaker cross-reactivity occurred with feline (feline infectious peritonitis virus) and canine CoVs. Using Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant SARS-CoV N protein and fragments, the cross-reactive region was localized between amino acids (aa) 120 to 208. The N-protein fragments comprising aa 360 to 412 and aa 1 to 213 reacted specifically with SARS convalescent-phase sera but not with negative human sera in ELISA; the fragment comprising aa 1 to 213 cross-reacted with antisera to animal CoVs, whereas the fragment comprising aa 360 to 412 did not cross-react and could be a potential candidate for SARS diagnosis. Particularly noteworthy, a single substitution at aa 120 of PRCV N protein diminished the cross-reactivity. We also demonstrated that the cross-reactivity is not universal for all group 1 CoVs, because HCoV-NL63 did not cross-react with SARS-CoV. One-way cross-reactivity of HCoV-NL63 with group 1 CoVs was localized to aa 1 to 39 and at least one other antigenic site in the N-protein C terminus, differing from the cross-reactive region identified in SARS-CoV N protein. The observed cross-reactivity is not a consequence of a higher level of amino acid identity between SARS-CoV and porcine CoV nucleoproteins, because sequence comparisons indicated that SARS-CoV N protein has amino acid identity similar to that of infectious bronchitis virus N protein and shares a higher level of identity with bovine CoV N protein within the cross-reactive region. The TGEV and SARS-CoV N proteins are RNA chaperons with long disordered regions. We speculate that during natural infection, antibodies target similar short antigenic sites within the N proteins of SARS-CoV and porcine group 1 CoVs that are exposed to an immune response. Identification of the cross-reactive and non-cross-reactive N-protein regions allows development of SARS-CoV-specific antibody assays for screening animal and human sera.
1
Cross-reactivity is not universal among group 1 coronaviruses: HCoV-NL63 does not cross-react with SARS-CoV, and its cross-reactive sites differ from the SARS-CoV N-protein region.
2
Moderate bidirectional antigenic cross-reactivity occurs between SARS-CoV and porcine TGEV/PRCV, mediated by the nucleoprotein rather than the spike protein.
3
SARS-CoV N-protein fragments spanning amino acids 1–213 and 360–412 specifically recognize SARS convalescent sera, while only the 1–213 fragment cross-reacts with animal-CoV antisera.
4
SARS-CoV nucleoprotein cross-reactivity with animal coronaviruses localizes to amino acids 120–208; a single PRCV N-protein substitution at position 120 diminishes it.
5
The 360–412 N-protein fragment does not cross-react with animal-CoV antisera and is proposed as a potential SARS diagnostic antigen.
6
Weaker cross-reactivity was detected between SARS-CoV and feline or canine group 1 coronaviruses.

SARS-CoV nucleoprotein and its antigenic cross-reactivity with group 1 animal coronaviruses

The localization and molecular mediation of two-way antigenic cross-reactivity, including the roles of N-protein regions and amino acid substitutions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2007-10-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Anastasia N. Vlasova
Xinsheng Zhang
Mustafa Hasöksüz
Hadya S. Nagesha
Lia M. Haynes
Ying Fang
Shan Lu
Linda J. Saif
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%