“Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice

«Удивление» и байесовский мозг: значение для теории и практики психотерапии
Jeremy Holmes, Tobias Nolte
2019-03-28

Bayesian inferencefree energy principlementalizingprediction errorpsychotherapy
The free energy principle (FEP, Friston 2010) has gained widespread interest and growing acceptance as a new paradigm of brain function, but has had little impact on the theory and practice of psychotherapy. The aim of this paper is to redress this. Brains rely on Bayesian inference during which ‘bottom-up’ sensations are matched with ‘top-down’ predictions. Discrepancies result in ‘prediction error’. The brain abhors informational ‘surprise’, which is minimised by a) action enhancing the statistical likelihood of sensory samples, b) revising inferences in the light of experience, updating ‘priors’ to reality-aligned ‘posteriors’ c) optimising the complexity of our generative models of a capricious world. In all three free is converted to bound energy. In psychopathology energy either remains unbound, as in trauma and inhibition of agency, or manifests restricted, anachronistic ‘top-down’ narratives. Psychotherapy fosters client agency, linguistic and practical. Temporary uncoupling bottom-up from top-down automatism and fostering scrutinised simulations sets a number of salutary processes in train. Mentalising enriches Bayesian inference, enabling experience and feeling states to be ‘metabolised’ and assimilated. ‘Free association’ enhances more inclusive sensory sampling, while dream analysis foregrounds salient emotional themes as ‘attractors’. FEP parallels with psychoanalytic theory are outlined, including Freud’s unpublished project, Bion’s ‘contact barrier’ concept, the Fonagy/Target model of sexuality, Laplanche’s therapist as ‘enigmatic signifier’, and the role of projective identification. Therapy stimulates patients to become aware of and revise the’ priors’ they bring to interpersonal experience. In the therapeutic ‘duet for one’, the energy binding skills and non-partisan stance of the analyst help sufferers face trauma without being overwhelmed by psychic entropy. Overall, the FEP provides a sound theoretical basis for psychotherapy practice, training and research.
1
Mentalising, free association, and dream analysis are presented as processes that enrich inference, broaden sensory sampling, and integrate emotionally salient experience.
2
Psychopathology is characterized as either unbound prediction error, such as trauma and inhibited agency, or restrictive, outdated top-down narratives.
3
Psychotherapy promotes agency and temporarily disrupts automatic prediction processes, enabling patients to scrutinize simulations and revise maladaptive priors.
4
The paper applies the free energy principle and Bayesian brain framework to psychotherapy theory and clinical practice.
5
The therapeutic relationship helps patients confront trauma without being overwhelmed, supporting revision of interpersonal expectations and more adaptive generative models.

The Bayesian brain and its psychopathological and psychotherapeutic functioning under the free energy principle

The role of prediction error minimization, Bayesian inference, agency, mentalizing, and revision of priors in psychopathology and psychotherapy

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-03-28
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Jeremy Holmes
Tobias Nolte
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%