Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims
Моральные права собственности при ведении переговоров по невыполнимым требованиям
2005-02-01
SCID: 54.1/gz9pa2sb
Discuss with AI
bargaining experimentbargaining with claimsentitlement effectsinfeasible claimsmoral property rights
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
In many business transactions, labor-management relations, international conflicts, and welfare-state reforms, bargainers hold strong entitlements that are often generated by claims that are not feasible anymore. These entitlements seem to shape negotiation behavior considerably. By using the novel setup of a “bargaining with claims” experiment, we provide new systematic evidence tracking the influence of entitlements and obligations through the whole bargaining process. We find strong entitlement effects that shape opening offers, bargaining duration, concessions, and (dis)agreements. We argue that entitlements constitute a “moral property right” that is influential independent of negotiators' legal property rights.
Key Findings
1
Entitlements remain influential even when the underlying claims are no longer feasible, indicating that they function as moral property rights.
2
Moral property rights affect negotiation behavior independently of negotiators’ formal legal property rights.
3
Strong entitlement effects shape negotiators’ opening offers, bargaining duration, concessions, and the likelihood of agreement or disagreement.
4
The study introduces a novel “bargaining with claims” experiment to track how entitlements and obligations influence the entire bargaining process.
Research Object
bargaining with infeasible claims
Research Subject
the influence of entitlements and obligations on bargaining behavior and outcomes, including opening offers, bargaining duration, concessions, and agreements
Publication Details
Publication Date
2005-02-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest