The GULag and Laogai: A Comparative Study of Forced Labor through Camp Literature
ГУЛАГ и Лаогай: сравнительное исследование принудительного труда посредством лагерной литературы
2012-12-01
SCID: 54.1/h8k59wqj
Discuss with AI
GulagLaogaicamp literaturecomparative studyforced labor
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This is the first comparative study ever undertaken in an investigation of the history of forced labor in the Soviet Union and China. It makes no claims to be exhaustive, and serves mainly as a foundation to further work in this subject in the near future. Various historical works and documents have been utilized to create, firstly, an acceptable overview of the history of the practice of forced labor in both countries, followed by a short history of so-called 'camp literature', or memoirs written by survivors of forced labor, generally speaking. The main focus is to analyze several key similarities and differences as they are found in examples from both countries.
Key Findings
1
Comparative analysis identifies key similarities and differences between Soviet and Chinese forced-labor systems through representative camp-literature examples.
2
It establishes a foundational, non-exhaustive overview of forced labor practices in both countries using historical works and documents.
3
The paper traces the development of “camp literature,” emphasizing survivor memoirs as sources for studying forced labor.
4
The study is intended to support and stimulate further comparative research on forced labor in the Soviet Union and China.
5
The study presents the first comparative investigation of forced labor histories in the Soviet Union and China.
Research Object
Forced labor camp systems in the Soviet Union and China (the Gulag and Laogai)
Research Subject
Comparative historical similarities and differences in forced labor and survivor camp literature
Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest