A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain–computer interface paradigms
Всесторонний обзор парадигм интерфейсов мозг–компьютер на основе ЭЭГ
2018-11-15
SCID: 54.1/hawjuk9f
Discuss with AI
BCI paradigmsEEG signal decodingEEG-based brain–computer interfacesMotor imageryNeurorehabilitation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Advances in brain science and computer technology in the past decade have led to exciting developments in brain-computer interface (BCI), thereby making BCI a top research area in applied science. The renaissance of BCI opens new methods of neurorehabilitation for physically disabled people (e.g. paralyzed patients and amputees) and patients with brain injuries (e.g. stroke patients). Recent technological advances such as wireless recording, machine learning analysis, and real-time temporal resolution have increased interest in electroencephalographic (EEG) based BCI approaches. Many BCI studies have focused on decoding EEG signals associated with whole-body kinematics/kinetics, motor imagery, and various senses. Thus, there is a need to understand the various experimental paradigms used in EEG-based BCI systems. Moreover, given that there are many available options, it is essential to choose the most appropriate BCI application to properly manipulate a neuroprosthetic or neurorehabilitation device. The current review evaluates EEG-based BCI paradigms regarding their advantages and disadvantages from a variety of perspectives. For each paradigm, various EEG decoding algorithms and classification methods are evaluated. The applications of these paradigms with targeted patients are summarized. Finally, potential problems with EEG-based BCI systems are discussed, and possible solutions are proposed.
Key Findings
1
BCI paradigm selection is important for effectively controlling neuroprosthetic or neurorehabilitation devices.
2
EEG-based BCI research decodes neural signals associated with whole-body kinematics and kinetics, motor imagery, and diverse sensory processes.
3
EEG-based brain–computer interfaces have advanced through wireless recording, machine-learning analysis, and real-time temporal resolution.
4
For each paradigm, the review evaluates EEG decoding algorithms and classification methods and summarizes applications involving targeted patient populations.
5
The review compares EEG-based BCI paradigms by their advantages and disadvantages to guide selection of appropriate neuroprosthetic and neurorehabilitation applications.
6
The review identifies potential problems in EEG-based BCI systems and discusses possible solutions, particularly for neurorehabilitation of paralysis, amputation, and brain injury.
Research Object
EEG-based brain–computer interface paradigms
Research Subject
their advantages, disadvantages, decoding and classification approaches, clinical applications, and potential problems
Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-11-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai5
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces2007
Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study2013
Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation2017
Brain–Computer Interfaces Using Sensorimotor Rhythms: Current State and Future Perspectives2014
EEG Source Imaging Enhances the Decoding of Complex Right-Hand Motor Imagery Tasks2015