Comparative Evaluation of Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique With and Without Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Treatment of Maxillary Anterior Gingival Recessions
Сравнительная оценка доступа через вестибулярный разрез и субпериостальный туннель (VISTA) с использованием и без использования усовершенствованной тромбоцитарной фибрины (A-PRF) для лечения рецессий десны в переднем отделе верхней челюсти
2023-06-22
SCID: 54.1/hchnu46d
Discuss with AI
Advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF)Gingival thicknessMean root coverage (RC)Miller Class I gingival recessionVestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA)
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Gingival recession is an apical shift of the gingival margin with exposure of the root surface to the oral cavity, which creates an esthetic problem. The present study was attempted to compare vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) with and without advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in the treatment of Miller Class I gingival recessions. A total of 24 patients were assigned randomly to either the test group (VISTA with A-PRF) or the control group (VISTA alone). Clinical parameters like recession depth, recession width, clinical attachment loss, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival thickness, and probing depth were recorded at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Intergroup comparison of mean root coverage (RC) in mm, %RC, change in width of keratinized gingiva and clinical attachment gain revealed no statistically significant difference (P > .05). Change in gingival thickness showed statistically significant improvement in test group. Within the limitations of this study, both treatment options (VISTA with A-PRF and VISTA alone) have resulted in predictable and comparable RC, with increased gingival thickness in the test group.
Key Findings
1
Both VISTA with A-PRF and VISTA alone produced predictable and comparable mean root coverage (RC) outcomes for Miller Class I gingival recessions at 3 and 6 months.
2
Clinical parameters (recession depth, recession width, clinical attachment loss, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival thickness, probing depth) were measured at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively in 24 randomized patients.
3
Gingival thickness increased significantly in the VISTA with A-PRF (test) group compared to VISTA alone.
4
Intergroup comparisons of mean RC in mm, percent RC, change in width of keratinized gingiva, and clinical attachment gain showed no statistically significant differences (P > .05).
Research Object
Treatment of maxillary anterior Miller Class I gingival recessions using the VISTA technique with and without advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF)
Research Subject
Comparative clinical outcomes (recession depth/width, mean and percent root coverage, clinical attachment gain, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival thickness, probing depth) of VISTA with A-PRF versus VISTA alone, including effect on gingival thickness
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-06-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest