MRI-Guided In-Bore Biopsy: Differences Between Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization in Primary and Secondary Biopsy Settings

Пункция в аппарате МРТ (MRI-guided in-bore biopsy): различия в обнаружении и локализации рака предстательной железы при первичной и повторной биопсии
Christian Arsov, Gerald Antoch, Peter Albers, Lars Schimmöller, Robert Rabenalt, D. Blondin, Michael Quentin
2015-12-23

MRI-guided in-bore biopsylesion size and prostate volume effectsprimary vs secondary prostate biopsyprostate cancer detection ratetumor localization (peripheral zone, transition zone, anterior stroma)
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate transrectal MRI-guided in-bore biopsy in patients who either were biopsy-naive (primary biopsy) or had undergone at least one previous negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (secondary biopsy) with regard to cancer detection rate, tumor localization, and lesion size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1602 biopsy cores from 297 consecutive patients (mean ± SD, 66.1 ± 7.8 years; median prostate-specific antigen value, 8.2 ng/mL) in primary (n = 160) and secondary (n = 137) prostate biopsy settings were evaluated in this retrospective study. All patients previously underwent prostate MRI (T2-weighted imaging, DWI, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging) at 3 T. All described lesions were biopsied with MRI-guided in-bore biopsy and were examined histologically. RESULTS: In 148 patients, overall 511 cores were positive for prostate cancer. Clinically significant prostate cancer (any Gleason pattern ≥ 4) was found in 82.4% of patients. The prostate cancer detection rate for patients who underwent primary biopsies was 55.6% and was 43.1% for patients who underwent secondary biopsies. In patients with primary versus secondary biopsies, prostate cancer was located peripherally in 62.9% versus 49.5% (p = 0.04), in the transition zone in 27.4% versus 27.5% (p = 1.0), and in the anterior stroma in 10.3% versus 22.9% (p < 0.01), respectively. The prostate cancer detection rates for patients with smaller prostate volumes (< 30 vs 30-50 vs > 50 mL; p < 0.01) or for patients with larger lesions (> 0.5 vs 0.25-0.5 vs < 0.25 cm(3); p < 0.01) were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided in-bore biopsy led to high detection rates in primary and secondary prostate biopsies. Prostate cancer detection rates were significantly higher for patients with larger lesions and smaller prostate glands. In patients who underwent secondary biopsies, prostate cancer was located in the anterior stroma at a significantly more frequent rate.
1
Clinically significant prostate cancer (any Gleason pattern ≥4) was present in 82.4% of cancer-positive patients.
2
Detection rates were significantly higher for patients with smaller prostate volumes (<30 vs 30–50 vs >50 mL; p < 0.01) and for patients with larger lesions (>0.5 vs 0.25–0.5 vs <0.25 cm³; p < 0.01).
3
MRI-guided in-bore biopsy yielded high overall prostate cancer detection rates in both primary and secondary biopsy settings.
4
Overall prostate cancer detection rate was 55.6% for primary-biopsy patients and 43.1% for secondary-biopsy patients.
5
Prostate cancer location differed by biopsy setting: peripheral zone 62.9% (primary) vs 49.5% (secondary), transition zone 27.4% vs 27.5%, anterior stroma 10.3% vs 22.9% (p < 0.01).

Transrectal MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy procedures in patients undergoing primary or secondary (repeat) prostate biopsy

Differences in prostate cancer detection rate, tumor localization (peripheral zone, transition zone, anterior stroma), and lesion size association between primary (biopsy-naive) and secondary (previous negative TRUS biopsy) biopsy settings using MRI-guided in-bore biopsy

Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-12-23
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Christian Arsov
Gerald Antoch
Peter Albers
Lars Schimmöller
Robert Rabenalt
D. Blondin
Michael Quentin
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%