Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing."
Мотивированное закрытие разума: «захват» и «замерзание»
1996-04-01
SCID: 54.1/hhfqhgwv
Discuss with AI
cognitive closureneed for closurepermanence tendencysocial-cognitive consequencesurgency tendency
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
A theoretical framework is outlined in which the key construct is the need for (nonspecific) cognitive closure. The need for closure is a desire for definite knowledge on some issue. It represents a dimension of stable individual differences as well as a situationally evocable state. The need for closure has widely ramifying consequences for social-cognitive phenomena at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and group levels of analysis. Those consequences derive from 2 general tendencies, those of urgency and performance. The urgency tendency represents an individual's inclination to attain closure as soon as possible, and the permanence tendency represents an individual's inclination to maintain it for as long as possible. Empirical evidence for present theory attests to diverse need for closure effects on fundamental social psychological phenomena, including impression formation, stereotyping, attribution, persuasion, group decision making, and language use in intergroup contexts.
Key Findings
1
Empirical evidence links need for closure to effects on impression formation, stereotyping, attribution, persuasion, group decision making, and intergroup language use.
2
Need for closure produces two general tendencies: urgency (seeking closure quickly) and permanence (maintaining closure over time).
3
The paper defines need for cognitive closure as a stable individual difference and a situationally evocable state reflecting desire for definite knowledge.
4
These urgency and permanence tendencies causally influence social-cognitive processes at intrapersonal, interpersonal, and group levels.
Research Object
Need for (nonspecific) cognitive closure as an individual difference and situational state
Research Subject
How the need for closure—via urgency and permanence tendencies—affects social-cognitive processes (impression formation, stereotyping, attribution, persuasion, group decision making, and intergroup language use)
Publication Details
Publication Date
1996-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest