Water treatment sludge for removal of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater
Осадок водоподготовки для удаления тяжёлых металлов из сточных вод гальванического производства
2017-09-06
SCID: 54.1/hpcqh47r
Discuss with AI
column adsorptionelectroplating wastewaterheavy metal removalmetal sorptionwater treatment sludge
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Suitability of aluminium-based water treatment sludge (WTS), a waste product from water treatment facilities, was assessed for removal of heavy metals from an electroplating wastewater which had high concentrations of copper and chromium along with other heavy metals. Batch tests with simulated wastewater in single-and multi-metal solutions indicated the influence of initial pH and WTS dose on removal of six metals namely Cu(II), Co(II), Cr(VI), Hg(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II). In general, removal of cationic metals such as Pb(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) increased with increase in pH while that of anionic Cr(VI) showed a reduction with increased pH values. Tests with multi-metal solution showed that the influence of competition was more pronounced at lower WTS dosages. Column test with diluted (100 times) real electroplating wastewater showed complete removal of copper up to 100 bed volumes while chromium removal ranged between 78-92%. Other metals which were present in lower concentrations were also effectively removed. Mass balance for copper and chromium showed that the WTS media had Cu(II) and Cr(VI) sorption capacities of about 1.7 and 3.5 mg/g of dried sludge, respectively. The study thus indicates that WTS has the potential to be used as a filtration/adsorption medium for removal of metals from metal-bearing wastewaters.
Key Findings
1
Aluminium-based water treatment sludge (WTS) was evaluated as a filtration/adsorption medium for removing heavy metals from electroplating wastewater.
2
Competition among metals in multi-metal solutions was more pronounced at lower WTS dosages.
3
In column tests using 100-fold diluted real electroplating wastewater, WTS completely removed copper through 100 bed volumes and removed 78–92% of chromium.
4
Removal of cationic metals, including Pb(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II), generally increased with higher initial pH, whereas Cr(VI) removal decreased.
5
The dried WTS exhibited approximate sorption capacities of 1.7 mg/g for Cu(II) and 3.5 mg/g for Cr(VI), while also effectively removing other lower-concentration metals.
Research Object
Aluminium-based water treatment sludge used to treat electroplating wastewater containing heavy metals
Research Subject
The effects of pH, sludge dose, metal competition, and column operation on the removal and sorption capacities of Cu(II), Co(II), Cr(VI), Hg(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II)
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-09-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest