Challenges in the Diagnostic Performance of Parasitological and Molecular Tests in the Surveillance of African Trypanosomiasis in Eastern Zambia
Проблемы диагностической эффективности паразитологических и молекулярных тестов при эпидемиологическом надзоре за африканским трипаносомозом в восточной Замбии
2021-04-30
SCID: 54.1/hw8tsv75
Discuss with AI
African animal trypanosomiasisITS-PCRTrypanosoma brucei s.l.diagnostic surveillancemicroscopy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
African animal trypanosomiasis (AAT) control programs rely on active case detection through the screening of animals reared in disease endemic areas. This study compared the application of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microscopy in the detection of trypanosomes in cattle blood in Mambwe, a rural district in eastern Zambia. Blood samples were collected from 227 cattle and tested for infection with trypanosomes using microscopy and Ribosomal RNA Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS)-PCR. Microscopy on the buffy coat detected 17 cases, whilst thin and thick smears detected 26 cases and 28 cases, respectively. In total, microscopy detected 40 cases. ITS-PCR-filter paper (FP) on blood spots stored on FP detected 47 cases, and ITS-PCR-FTA on blood spots stored on Whatman FTA Classic cards detected 83 cases. Using microscopy as the gold standard, ITS-PCR-FTA had a better specificity (SP) and sensitivity (SE) (SP = 72.2%; SE = 77.5%; kappa = 0.35) than ITS-PCR-FP (SP = 88%; SE = 60%; kappa = 0.45). The prevalence of Trypanosoma brucei s.l. was higher on ITS-PCR-FTA (19/227) than on ITS-PCR-FP (0/227). Our results illustrate the complexities around trypanosomiasis surveillance in rural Africa and provide evidence of the impact that field conditions and staff training can have on diagnostic results, which in turn impact the success of tsetse and trypanosomiasis control programs in the region.
Key Findings
1
Diagnostic outcomes were strongly affected by field conditions and staff training, complicating surveillance and potentially reducing control-program effectiveness.
2
Microscopy detected 40 infections overall, while ITS-PCR detected 47 cases using filter paper and 83 cases using Whatman FTA cards.
3
Relative to microscopy, ITS-PCR-FTA showed 77.5% sensitivity and 72.2% specificity, whereas ITS-PCR-filter paper showed 60% sensitivity and 88% specificity.
4
The study compared microscopy and ITS-PCR methods for detecting trypanosome infections in blood from 227 cattle in eastern Zambia.
5
Trypanosoma brucei sensu lato prevalence was detected as 19/227 with ITS-PCR-FTA but 0/227 with ITS-PCR-filter paper.
Research Object
Trypanosomes in cattle blood from Mambwe, eastern Zambia
Research Subject
The comparative diagnostic performance, sensitivity, specificity, and detection of trypanosome infections by microscopy and ITS-PCR under field surveillance conditions
Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-04-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
24
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest