Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
Интегрированная защита растений для устойчивой интенсификации сельского хозяйства в Азии и Африке
2015-03-05
SCID: 54.1/j9zx4ryv
Discuss with AI
Asia and AfricaIntegrated pest managementPesticide reductionSustainable intensificationTropical smallholders
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a leading complement and alternative to synthetic pesticides and a form of sustainable intensification with particular importance for tropical smallholders. Global pesticide use has grown over the past 20 years to 3.5 billion kg/year, amounting to a global market worth $45 billion. The external costs of pesticides are $4-$19 (€3-15) per kg of active ingredient applied, suggesting that IPM approaches that result in lower pesticide use will benefit, not only farmers, but also wider environments and human health. Evidence for IPM's impacts on pesticide use and yields remains patchy. We contribute an evaluation using data from 85 IPM projects from 24 countries of Asia and Africa implemented over the past twenty years. Analysing outcomes on productivity and reliance on pesticides, we find a mean yield increase across projects and crops of 40.9% (SD 72.3), combined with a decline in pesticide use to 30.7% (SD 34.9) compared with baseline. A total of 35 of 115 (30%) crop combinations resulted in a transition to zero pesticide use. We assess successes in four types of IPM projects, and find that at least 50% of pesticide use is not needed in most agroecosystems. Nonetheless, policy support for IPM is relatively rare, counter-interventions from pesticide industry common, and the IPM challenge never done as pests, diseases and weeds evolve and move.
Key Findings
1
Across most agroecosystems, at least 50% of pesticide use was found to be unnecessary.
2
An evaluation of 85 IPM projects across 24 Asian and African countries found mean crop yields increased by 40.9% (SD 72.3).
3
IPM adoption is constrained by limited policy support, frequent pesticide-industry counter-interventions, and continually evolving pest, disease, and weed pressures.
4
IPM projects reduced pesticide use to 30.7% (SD 34.9) of baseline levels, indicating substantial reductions alongside higher productivity.
5
Thirty-five of 115 crop combinations (30%) transitioned to zero pesticide use under IPM.
Research Object
IPM projects in tropical smallholder agroecosystems across 24 countries in Asia and Africa
Research Subject
the impacts of IPM on crop productivity and reliance on pesticide use, including transitions to zero pesticide use
Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-03-05
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest