From ‘Whodunit’ to ‘How’: Detective Stories and Auditability in Qualitative Business Ethics Research
От «кто это сделал?» к «как?»: детективные истории и аудируемость в качественных исследованиях деловой этики
2020-03-19
SCID: 54.1/jazvru7g
Discuss with AI
narrative-based methodologyqualitative business ethics researchresearch auditabilityresearch transparencysecond-party audits
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract Ethical considerations in today’s businesses are manifold and range from human rights issues and the well-being of employees to income inequality and environmental sustainability. Regardless of the specific topic being investigated, an integral part of business ethics research consists of deeply comprehending the personal meanings, intentions, behaviors, judgements, and attitudes that people possess. To this end, researchers are often encouraged to use more qualitative methods to understand the dynamic and fuzzy field of business ethics, which involves collecting in-depth information in real time. Qualitative methods in business ethics research, however, raise the two-fold responsibility of not only conducting such investigations fairly and appropriately, but also clearly communicating the research processes and outcomes to readers. Especially leading journals in the field such asJournal of Business Ethicshave a responsibility to conduct their business (i.e., the business of high standard publishing) ethically, by making sure that their content represents clear and honest communications of research concerning a wide range of business systems. Unfortunately, the question of how to effectively facilitate transparent insight into the research process of qualitative business ethics studies is still unresolved. Both the lack of a clear communication of methods and results and the iterative nature of qualitative methods often make it difficult for the readers to properly assess a qualitative business ethics study and understand its results. We propose the use of narratives to remedy this situation. Specifically, we suggest a new classification of audits, named second-party audits, to facilitate a better understanding of research procedures ex-post for the readers. To illustrate this new narrative-based reconceptualization of audits, we use Agatha Christie’s detective novelThe Murder on the Linksas a frame of reference.
Key Findings
1
Agatha Christie’s The Murder on the Links is used to illustrate this narrative-based reconceptualization of audits.
2
It introduces “second-party audits” as a new audit classification enabling readers to retrospectively evaluate qualitative research procedures.
3
Qualitative business ethics research requires transparent communication of research processes and outcomes, but this remains unresolved.
4
The paper proposes narratives as a mechanism for making qualitative research procedures more transparent and understandable.
5
Unclear methods reporting and the iterative nature of qualitative inquiry hinder readers’ ability to assess studies and interpret their findings.
Research Object
qualitative business ethics research studies and their research processes
Research Subject
auditability and transparent ex-post communication of qualitative research procedures and outcomes through narrative-based second-party audits
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-03-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest