BreastScreening-AI: Evaluating medical intelligent agents for human-AI interactions

BreastScreening-AI: оценка интеллектуальных медицинских агентов во взаимодействии человека и искусственного интеллекта
Jacinto C. Nascimento, Nuno Nunes, Francisco Maria Calisto, Carlos Santiago
2022-03-29

BreastScreening-AIclinician-AI diagnosishuman-AI interactionmedical intelligent agentsmultimodal breast image classification
In this paper, we developed BreastScreening-AI within two scenarios for the classification of multimodal beast images: (1) Clinician-Only; and (2) Clinician-AI. The novelty relies on the introduction of a deep learning method into a real clinical workflow for medical imaging diagnosis. We attempt to address three high-level goals in the two above scenarios. Concretely, how clinicians: i) accept and interact with these systems, revealing whether are explanations and functionalities required; ii) are receptive to the introduction of AI-assisted systems, by providing benefits from mitigating the clinical error; and iii) are affected by the AI assistance. We conduct an extensive evaluation embracing the following experimental stages: (a) patient selection with different severities, (b) qualitative and quantitative analysis for the chosen patients under the two different scenarios. We address the high-level goals through a real-world case study of 45 clinicians from nine institutions. We compare the diagnostic and observe the superiority of the Clinician-AI scenario, as we obtained a decrease of 27% for False-Positives and 4% for False-Negatives. Through an extensive experimental study, we conclude that the proposed design techniques positively impact the expectations and perceptive satisfaction of 91% clinicians, while decreasing the time-to-diagnose by 3 min per patient.
1
A real-world case study involved 45 clinicians from nine institutions and included qualitative and quantitative assessments across patients with different severities.
2
BreastScreening-AI integrates deep learning for multimodal breast-image classification into a real clinical diagnostic workflow.
3
Clinician-AI assistance reduced false positives by 27% and false negatives by 4% compared with clinician-only diagnosis.
4
The proposed interaction and design techniques improved perceived expectations and satisfaction for 91% of clinicians while reducing diagnosis time by 3 minutes per patient.
5
The study evaluates clinician-only and clinician-AI scenarios, examining acceptance, interaction needs, perceived benefits, and effects of AI assistance.

BreastScreening-AI medical intelligent-agent system used with clinicians for multimodal breast-image classification and diagnosis

Clinician acceptance, interaction, diagnostic performance, perceived satisfaction, and time-to-diagnosis in Clinician-Only versus Clinician-AI workflows

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-03-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
124
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Jacinto C. Nascimento
Nuno Nunes
Francisco Maria Calisto
Carlos Santiago
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%