Prospective, Randomized Study on the Use of a Prosthetic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia of Permanent Colostomy

Проспективное рандомизированное исследование применения протезирующей сетки для профилактики парастомальной грыжи при постоянной колостоме
Mika T. Vierimaa, Kai Klintrup, Fausto Biancari, Mikael Victorzon, Monika Carpelan‐Holmström, Jyrki Kössi, Ilmo Kellokumpu, Erkki Rauvala, Pasi Ohtonen, Jyrki Mäkelä, Tero Rautio
2015-09-05

laparoscopic abdominoperineal resectionparastomal herniapermanent colostomyprophylactic meshrandomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia, but evidence to support this approach is scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic placement of a prophylactic, dual-component, intraperitoneal onlay mesh around a colostomy is safe and prevents parastomal hernia formation after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. DESIGN: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 2 university and 3 central Finnish hospitals. PATIENTS: From 2010 to 2013, 83 patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer were recruited. After withdrawals and exclusions, the outcome of 70 patients, 35 patients in each study group, could be examined. INTERVENTIONS: In the intervention group, an end colostomy was created with placement of a intraperitoneal, dual-component onlay mesh and compared with a group with a traditional stoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the incidence of clinically and radiologically detected parastomal hernias and their extent 12 months after surgery. Stoma-related morbidity and the need for surgical repair of parastomal hernia were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Parastomal hernia was observed by clinical inspection in 5 intervention patients (14.3%) and in 12 control patients (32.3%; p = 0.049). Surgical repair of parastomal hernia was performed in 1 control patient (3.2%) and in none of the patients in the intervention group. CT detected parastomal hernia in 18 intervention patients (51.4%) and in 17 control patients (53.1%; p = 1.00). The extent of hernias was similar according to European Hernia Society classification (p = 0.41). Colostomy-related morbidity (32.3% vs 14.3%; p = 0.140) did not differ between the study groups. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its small size and short follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic laparoscopic placement of intraperitoneal onlay mesh does not significantly reduce the overall risk of radiologically detected parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. However, prophylactic mesh repair was associated with significantly lower risk of clinically detected parastomal hernia.
1
A prospective multicenter randomized trial evaluated prophylactic intraperitoneal dual-component mesh placement during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.
2
At 12 months, clinically detected parastomal hernia occurred less frequently with prophylactic mesh than with a traditional stoma: 14.3% versus 32.3% (p = 0.049).
3
CT-detected parastomal hernia rates were similar between groups: 51.4% with mesh versus 53.1% without mesh (p = 1.00).
4
Colostomy-related morbidity did not differ significantly, while interpretation is limited by the small sample size and short follow-up.
5
Hernia extent by European Hernia Society classification did not differ between groups, and only one control patient required surgical repair.

Permanent end colostomy after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer, with or without prophylactic intraperitoneal dual-component onlay mesh

The safety and effectiveness of prophylactic laparoscopic mesh placement in preventing parastomal hernia and reducing stoma-related morbidity

Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-09-05
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Mika T. Vierimaa
Kai Klintrup
Fausto Biancari
Mikael Victorzon
Monika Carpelan‐Holmström
Jyrki Kössi
Ilmo Kellokumpu
Erkki Rauvala
Pasi Ohtonen
Jyrki Mäkelä
Tero Rautio
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%