Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state
Технико-экономическая оценка архитектур циклов Жуля—Брайтона для преобразования высокопотенциального тепла в электроэнергию с использованием CO₂ в сверхкритическом состоянии
2018-02-04
SCID: 54.1/jrhngy26
Discuss with AI
Joule-Brayton cycleexergy analysisheat-to-power conversionsupercritical CO2 cyclestechno-economic assessment
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Bottoming thermodynamic power cycles using supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) are a promising technology to exploit high temperature waste heat sources. CO2 is a non-flammable and thermally stable compound, and due to its favourable thermophysical properties in the supercritical state, it can achieve high cycle efficiencies and a substantial reduction in size and cost compared to alternative heat to power conversion technologies. Eight variants of the sCO2 Joule-Brayton cycle have been investigated. Cycle modelling and sensitivity analysis identified the Turbine Inlet Temperature (TIT) as the most influencing variable on cycle performance, with reference to a heat source gas flow rate of 1.0 kg/s and 650 °C. Energy, exergy and cost metrics for different cycle layouts have been compared for varying TIT in the range between 250 °C and 600 °C. The analysis has shown that the most complex sCO2 cycle configurations lead to higher overall efficiency and net power output but also to higher investment costs. Conversely, more basic architectures, such as the simple regenerative cycle, with a TIT of 425 °C, would be able to achieve an overall efficiency of 25.2%, power output of 93.7 kWe and a payback period of less than two years.
Key Findings
1
A simple regenerative cycle at 425 °C TIT achieved 25.2% overall efficiency, 93.7 kWe power output, and a payback period below two years.
2
Cycle performance and economic metrics were compared across TIT values from 250 °C to 600 °C.
3
Eight supercritical-CO2 Joule–Brayton cycle architectures were evaluated using energy, exergy, economic, and sensitivity analyses.
4
More complex sCO2 cycle configurations achieved higher overall efficiency and net power output, but required greater investment costs.
5
Turbine Inlet Temperature was identified as the most influential variable affecting cycle performance for a 1.0 kg/s, 650 °C heat-source gas flow.
Research Object
sCO2 Joule–Brayton cycle architectures for converting high-grade heat and waste heat into power
Research Subject
Techno-economic performance of eight cycle configurations, including the effects of turbine inlet temperature on efficiency, power output, exergy, investment cost, and payback period
Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-02-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest