Recent Applications of Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Literature Review
Современные применения объяснимого искусственного интеллекта (XAI): систематический обзор литературы
2024-10-02
SCID: 54.1/jv6k2rar
Discuss with AI
Explainable AI (XAI)PRISMA methodologySHAP and LIMESystematic literature reviewXAI evaluation frameworks
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This systematic literature review employs the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to investigate recent applications of explainable AI (XAI) over the past three years. From an initial pool of 664 articles identified through the Web of Science database, 512 peer-reviewed journal articles met the inclusion criteria—namely, being recent, high-quality XAI application articles published in English—and were analyzed in detail. Both qualitative and quantitative statistical techniques were used to analyze the identified articles: qualitatively by summarizing the characteristics of the included studies based on predefined codes, and quantitatively through statistical analysis of the data. These articles were categorized according to their application domains, techniques, and evaluation methods. Health-related applications were particularly prevalent, with a strong focus on cancer diagnosis, COVID-19 management, and medical imaging. Other significant areas of application included environmental and agricultural management, industrial optimization, cybersecurity, finance, transportation, and entertainment. Additionally, emerging applications in law, education, and social care highlight XAI’s expanding impact. The review reveals a predominant use of local explanation methods, particularly SHAP and LIME, with SHAP being favored for its stability and mathematical guarantees. However, a critical gap in the evaluation of XAI results is identified, as most studies rely on anecdotal evidence or expert opinion rather than robust quantitative metrics. This underscores the urgent need for standardized evaluation frameworks to ensure the reliability and effectiveness of XAI applications. Future research should focus on developing comprehensive evaluation standards and improving the interpretability and stability of explanations. These advancements are essential for addressing the diverse demands of various application domains while ensuring trust and transparency in AI systems.
Key Findings
1
A PRISMA-based review identified 664 Web of Science records, with 512 peer-reviewed English journal articles meeting the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis.
2
Health-related applications dominated recent XAI research, especially cancer diagnosis, COVID-19 management, and medical imaging; environmental, industrial, cybersecurity, finance, transportation, and other domains were also represented.
3
Local explanation methods predominated, with SHAP and LIME used most frequently; SHAP was favored for its reported stability and mathematical guarantees.
4
Most reviewed studies evaluated explanations using anecdotal evidence or expert opinion rather than robust quantitative metrics, revealing a major evaluation gap.
5
The review identifies an urgent need for standardized, comprehensive evaluation frameworks that improve the reliability, interpretability, and stability of XAI applications.
Research Object
Recent explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) applications across diverse domains
Research Subject
Application domains, explanation techniques, and evaluation methods, including the reliability, effectiveness, interpretability, and stability of XAI explanations
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-10-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
176
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai8
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions2017
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)2018
A survey of methods for explaining black box models2019
Machine Learning Interpretability: A Survey on Methods and Metrics2019
A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learning2021
From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI2023
A multilayer multimodal detection and prediction model based on explainable artificial intelligence for Alzheimer’s disease2021