Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer
Осимертиниб или платино-пеметрексед при раке легкого с мутацией EGFR T790M
2016-12-06
SCID: 54.1/kfbc68ss
Discuss with AI
EGFR T790M-positive lung cancerNon-small-cell lung cancerOsimertinibPlatinum-pemetrexed therapyProgression-free survival
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The efficacy of osimertinib as compared with platinum-based therapy plus pemetrexed in such patients is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned 419 patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, who had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) plus either carboplatin (target area under the curve, 5 [AUC5]) or cisplatin (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. In all the patients, disease had progressed during receipt of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (10.1 months vs. 4.4 months; hazard ratio; 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.41; P<0.001). The objective response rate was significantly better with osimertinib (71%; 95% CI, 65 to 76) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (31%; 95% CI, 24 to 40) (odds ratio for objective response, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.47 to 8.48; P<0.001). Among 144 patients with metastases to the central nervous system (CNS), the median duration of progression-free survival was longer among patients receiving osimertinib than among those receiving platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (8.5 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.49). The proportion of patients with adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with osimertinib (23%) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib had significantly greater efficacy than platinum therapy plus pemetrexed in patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (including those with CNS metastases) in whom disease had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; AURA3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02151981 .).
Key Findings
1
Among patients with central nervous system metastases, osimertinib prolonged median progression-free survival compared with platinum–pemetrexed: 8.5 versus 4.2 months.
2
Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred less frequently with osimertinib than with platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy: 23% versus 47%.
3
In EGFR T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, osimertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy.
4
Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months with osimertinib versus 4.4 months with platinum–pemetrexed (hazard ratio, 0.30; P<0.001).
5
Osimertinib produced a significantly higher objective response rate than platinum–pemetrexed: 71% versus 31% (odds ratio, 5.39; P<0.001).
Research Object
Patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer whose disease progressed after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy
Research Subject
Comparative efficacy and safety of osimertinib versus platinum–pemetrexed therapy, including progression-free survival, objective response, CNS disease control, and grade ≥3 adverse events
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-12-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest