Influence of Metal Artifact by Orthodontic Appliances on Brain MRI

Влияние артефактов от ортодонтических аппаратов на МРТ головного мозга
Takashi Kaneda, Kazutaka Kasai, Shiori Asano, Taiga Fukuda, Yasuhide Makiyama, Hitoshi Hirota, Katsuhiko Saitoh, Shinichi Negishi
2016-01-01

CoCr alloy clipEcho Planar Imaging (EPI)Fast Field Echo T1-weighted (FFE)Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR)MRI artifact feasibilityShort Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR)Spin Echo T1-weighted (SE-T1)Turbo Spin Echo T2-weighted (TSE-T2)brain MRI distortionceramic bracketsdiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)metal artifactorthodontic appliancesresin bracketsstainless steel bracketstitanium bracketstitanium single tube
The purpose of this study was to evaluate brain MRI distortion caused by orthodontic appliances. MRI was performed in 10 subjects and after insertion 3 kind of orthodontic appliances(type1-3), the MRI were compared. Type 1 used resin brackets in the incisor teeth, stainless steel brackets in the premolar teeth and stainless steel single tube in the molar teeth. Type2 used ceramic brackets in the incisor teeth, titanium brackets in the premolar teeth and titanium single tube in the molar teeth. Type3 used ceramic brackets with CoCr alloy clip in the incisor teeth, titanium brackets in the premolar teeth and titanium single tube in the molar teeth. Each MR sequence consisted of 6 sequences.: the Echo Planar Imaging method diffusion-weighted images(DWI), Spin Echo sequence(SE)T1-weighted images, Fast Field Echo sequence(FFE)T1-weighted images, Turbo Spin echo sequence(TSE)T2-weighted images, fat-supression image as Short Tau inversion recovery method(STIR), and Fluid attenuated-inversion recovery(FLAIR).Two neurosurgeons examined the MRI for distortion in predetermined regions of the brain. In Type 1, MRI imaging by neither DWI nor FFE is feasible in these sites. SE-T1, TSE-T2, FLAIR and STIR are indicating the feasibility for MRI imaging. In Type 2 and Type 3, by all imaging types and at all of the anatomical sites, are indicating the feasibility for MRI imaging in the brain. The study showed that ceramic brackets, ceramic brackets with CoCr alloy clip, titanium brackets and titanium tubes do not always have to be removed before brain MRI.
1
Conclusion: ceramic brackets (with or without CoCr clip), titanium brackets and titanium tubes do not always need removal before brain MRI.
2
For Type 1, SE-T1, TSE-T2, FLAIR and STIR sequences remained feasible despite artifacts from stainless steel components.
3
Orthodontic appliances can cause brain MRI distortion, assessed across three appliance types and six MRI sequences in 10 subjects.
4
Type 1 (resin incisor, stainless steel premolar and molar) produced non-feasible imaging with DWI and FFE in affected brain sites.
5
Type 2 (ceramic incisor, titanium premolar and molar) allowed feasible brain imaging across all sequences and anatomical sites.
6
Type 3 (ceramic with CoCr alloy clip incisor, titanium premolar and molar) also allowed feasible brain imaging across all sequences and anatomical sites.

Orthodontic appliances (various bracket and tube materials/configurations) as sources of metal artifacts affecting brain MRI

Effect of these orthodontic appliance-induced metal artifacts on the feasibility and image distortion of multiple brain MRI sequences (DWI, SE-T1, FFE-T1, TSE-T2, STIR, FLAIR) across predefined brain regions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Takashi Kaneda
Kazutaka Kasai
Shiori Asano
Taiga Fukuda
Yasuhide Makiyama
Hitoshi Hirota
Katsuhiko Saitoh
Shinichi Negishi
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%