Mexican Migration to the United States: A Critical Review
Мексиканская миграция в Соединённые Штаты: критический обзор
1992-01-01
SCID: 54.1/ky4pdu8b
Discuss with AI
Mexican migrationUnited Statesempirical generalizationsmigration studiesresearch literature
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Although social scientists usually do not speak in terms of laws, they believe they are at least able to make valid empirical generalizations. In studies of Mexican migration to the United States, for example, generalizations drawn from the research literature abound. Thus the problem is not that generalizations are lacking but that they are frequently inconsistent and contradictory. Often such inferences are simply invalid because they are based less on evidence than on the investigator's own preconceptions. As a result, the field of Mexican migration studies has been plagued by a fragmented debate that seems to go on and on without resolution.
Key Findings
1
Many conclusions in the literature are invalid because they rely more on researchers’ preconceptions than on supporting evidence.
2
Research on Mexican migration to the United States contains numerous empirical generalizations, but they are frequently inconsistent and contradictory.
3
The field has consequently developed a fragmented, unresolved debate that persists without clear resolution.
Research Object
Mexican migration to the United States
Research Subject
The validity, consistency, and evidentiary basis of empirical generalizations in the research literature on Mexican migration
Publication Details
Publication Date
1992-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest