Conditions for void formation in friction stir welding from machine learning

Условия образования пустот при сварке трением с перемешиванием на основе машинного обучения
Yang Du, Tuhin Mukherjee, T. DebRoy
2019-07-09

Bayesian neural networkdecision treefriction stir weldingmaximum shear stressvoid formation
Abstract Friction stir welded joints often contain voids that are detrimental to their mechanical properties. Here we investigate the conditions for void formation using a decision tree and a Bayesian neural network. Three types of input data sets including unprocessed welding parameters and computed variables using an analytical and a numerical model of friction stir welding were examined. One hundred and eight sets of independent experimental data on void formation for the friction stir welding of three aluminum alloys, AA2024, AA2219, and AA6061, were analyzed. The neural network-based analysis with welding parameters, specimen and tool geometries, and material properties as input predicted void formation with 83.3% accuracy. When the potential causative variables, i.e., temperature, strain rate, torque, and maximum shear stress on the tool pin were computed from an approximate analytical model of friction stir welding, 90 and 93.3% accuracies of prediction were obtained using the decision tree and the neural network, respectively. When the same causative variables were computed from a rigorous numerical model, both the neural network and the decision tree predicted void formation with 96.6% accuracy. Among these four causative variables, the temperature and maximum shear stress showed the maximum influence on void formation.
1
Analytical-model-derived temperature, strain rate, torque, and maximum tool-pin shear stress increased prediction accuracy to 90% with a decision tree and 93.3% with a neural network.
2
Decision trees and Bayesian neural networks were used to identify conditions causing void formation in friction stir welded aluminum joints.
3
Numerical-model-derived causative variables enabled both machine-learning methods to predict void formation with 96.6% accuracy.
4
Temperature and maximum shear stress on the tool pin had the greatest influence on void formation among the evaluated variables.
5
Using welding parameters, geometries, and material properties, the neural network predicted void formation with 83.3% accuracy across 108 experiments and three alloys.

Friction stir welded joints of aluminum alloys AA2024, AA2219, and AA6061

Conditions and causative factors of void formation, particularly the effects of temperature and maximum shear stress on the tool pin

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-07-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Yang Du
Tuhin Mukherjee
T. DebRoy
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%