A comprehensive review of waste heat recovery from a diesel engine using organic rankine cycle

Всесторонний обзор рекуперации бросовой теплоты дизельного двигателя с использованием органического цикла Ренкина
P. Varshil, Devendra Deshmukh
2021-07-01

diesel engineexergy efficiencyorganic Rankine cyclewaste heat recoveryworking fluids
ORC has gained attraction in diesel engines due to its outstanding capability in improving thermal efficiency and fuel economy by recovering heat from low-temperature waste heat sources. This review paper initially discusses the engine–ORC system based on the trade-off between parameters such as weight, backpressure, space, and cost versus thermal efficiency and fuel economy. Working fluid, configuration, and process parameter selections are analyzed based on the steady-state ORC model. Based on the analysis, Isentropic working fluids are suggested for engine–ORC systems as they undergo complete dry expansion and simultaneously enters the condenser with minimum superheat. The steady-state ORC model has thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency up to 25% and 36% for single-loop systems respectively. Exergetic efficiency for combined recovery system are observed upto 46%. Single loop ORC systems generate about 25% lower power output than dual loop ORC systems. Single loop ORC configurations are suggested for vehicular-based diesel engine applications as they utilize waste heat from multiple sources ensuring weight, space, and cost concerns. Dual loop ORC configurations are proposed for stationary diesel engine applications due to lower weight and space constraints. Steady-state ORC models are suitable for analyzing stationary diesel engine applications, highway and marine-based vehicular diesel engine applications due to nearly steady exhaust conditions. Dynamic ORC models are discussed for in-city-based vehicular diesel engine applications due to transient exhaust conditions and compared for dynamic analysis based on computational time, cost and accuracy.
1
Dual-loop systems are better suited to stationary engines, while steady-state models fit nearly steady exhaust applications and dynamic models are needed for in-city vehicles with transient exhaust conditions.
2
Isentropic working fluids are recommended because they enable complete dry expansion while entering the condenser with minimal superheat.
3
Single-loop ORC systems produce approximately 25% less power than dual-loop systems but are preferred for vehicles because they recover heat from multiple sources with lower weight, space, and cost.
4
Steady-state single-loop ORC systems achieve thermal efficiencies up to 25% and exergy efficiencies up to 36%; combined recovery systems reach 46% exergetic efficiency.
5
The review evaluates diesel-engine ORC systems by balancing weight, backpressure, space, and cost against thermal efficiency and fuel economy.

diesel-engine waste-heat recovery systems based on organic Rankine cycles

ORC configuration, working-fluid, and process-parameter effects on thermal/exergy efficiency, power output, fuel economy, and applicability under stationary and transient engine conditions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-07-01
Journal
Energy Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
ISSN
2352-4847
Cited by
91
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
P. Varshil
Devendra Deshmukh
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%