Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study

Различия между «жёсткими» и «вложенными» (loosely: свободными) культурами: исследование в 33 странах
Lili Duan, Darius K.‐S. Chan, Michele J. Gelfand, Karl Peltzer, Anu Realo, Manfred Schmitt, Ronald Fischer, Lisa H. Nishii, Soon Ang, Alessia D’Amato, Evert Van de Vliert, Jana L. Raver, Lisa M. Leslie, Janetta Lun, Beng Chong Lim, Assaf Almaliach, Jakobina Arnadottir, Zeynep Aycan, Klaus Boehnke, Paweł Boski, Rosa Cabecinhas, Jagdeep S. Chhokar, Montserrat Subirats Ferrer, Iris C. Fischlmayr, Márta Fülöp, James Georgas, Emiko S. Kashima, Yoshishima Kashima, Kibum Kim, Alain Lempereur, Patricia Márquez, Rozhan Othman, Bert Overlaet, Penny Panagiotopoulou, Lorena R. Pérez-Floriano, Лариса Пономаренко, Vidar Schei, Peter B. Smith, Nazar Soomro, Erna Szabo, Nalinee Taveesin, Midori Toyama, Naharika Vohra, Colleen Ward, Susumu Yamaguchi
2011-05-26

33-nation studycultural tightness-loosenessecological and historical threatspsychological affordancessocialization in institutions
With data from 33 nations, we illustrate the differences between cultures that are tight (have many strong norms and a low tolerance of deviant behavior) versus loose (have weak social norms and a high tolerance of deviant behavior). Tightness-looseness is part of a complex, loosely integrated multilevel system that comprises distal ecological and historical threats (e.g., high population density, resource scarcity, a history of territorial conflict, and disease and environmental threats), broad versus narrow socialization in societal institutions (e.g., autocracy, media regulations), the strength of everyday recurring situations, and micro-level psychological affordances (e.g., prevention self-guides, high regulatory strength, need for structure). This research advances knowledge that can foster cross-cultural understanding in a world of increasing global interdependence and has implications for modeling cultural change.
1
Distal threats associated with tighter cultures include high population density, resource scarcity, historical territorial conflict, and disease/environmental threats.
2
Institutional and societal factors (e.g., autocracy, media regulation) and the strength of everyday situations differ between tight and loose cultures.
3
Micro-level psychological affordances in tight cultures include prevention self-guides, higher regulatory strength, and greater need for structure.
4
Tight cultures have many strong norms and low tolerance for deviant behavior, while loose cultures have weak norms and high tolerance for deviance.
5
Tightness-looseness is embedded in a multilevel system linking distal ecological and historical threats to cultural strength of norms.

National cultures across 33 nations characterized by tightness versus looseness

Differences in cultural tightness–looseness and their multilevel correlates including ecological/historical threats, institutional socialization breadth, strength of everyday situations, and micro-level psychological affordances

Publication Details
Publication Date
2011-05-26
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Lili Duan
Darius K.‐S. Chan
Michele J. Gelfand
Karl Peltzer
Anu Realo
Manfred Schmitt
Ronald Fischer
Lisa H. Nishii
Soon Ang
Alessia D’Amato
Evert Van de Vliert
Jana L. Raver
Lisa M. Leslie
Janetta Lun
Beng Chong Lim
Assaf Almaliach
Jakobina Arnadottir
Zeynep Aycan
Klaus Boehnke
Paweł Boski
Rosa Cabecinhas
Jagdeep S. Chhokar
Montserrat Subirats Ferrer
Iris C. Fischlmayr
Márta Fülöp
James Georgas
Emiko S. Kashima
Yoshishima Kashima
Kibum Kim
Alain Lempereur
Patricia Márquez
Rozhan Othman
Bert Overlaet
Penny Panagiotopoulou
Lorena R. Pérez-Floriano
Лариса Пономаренко
Vidar Schei
Peter B. Smith
Nazar Soomro
Erna Szabo
Nalinee Taveesin
Midori Toyama
Naharika Vohra
Colleen Ward
Susumu Yamaguchi
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%