Technology Readiness and System-Level Maturity of Aerospace Development in Peru: An Engineering-Based Systematic Review
Технологическая готовность и системная зрелость аэрокосмического развития в Перу: систематический обзор на основе инженерного подхода
2026-02-12
SCID: 54.1/mf9x24m9
Discuss with AI
Aerospace developmentPRISMA 2020System-level maturityTechnology assessmentTechnology readiness levels
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This paper presents a comprehensive technology-oriented review of aerospace development in Peru, integrating historical scientific infrastructure, suborbital experimentation, orbital satellite missions, and a systematic literature review of contemporary engineering research. Beyond a descriptive historical account, the study evaluates national aerospace capabilities from a system-engineering perspective, emphasizing technology readiness levels (TRL), subsystem integration, and validation environments. A regional comparison based on UNOOSA, CelesTrak, and nanosatellite databases contextualizes Peru’s orbital activity within South America. Furthermore, a systematic literature review using the PRISMA 2020 methodology was performed covering the period 2000–2025. The systematic literature review identifies nine major aerospace research lines, quantifies institutional participation through bibliometric analysis, and assigns TRLs using consistent criteria derived from reported experimental and operational evidence. The results reveal a fragmented yet progressively maturing ecosystem, characterized by strong analytical and laboratory-level capabilities (TRL 2–5) but limited system-level integration and flight-qualified developments (TRLs N≥6). These findings highlight structural gaps in program continuity, test infrastructure, and transition mechanisms from academic prototyping to operational aerospace systems. Overall, this work establishes a technology assessment baseline for an emerging space nation, providing evidence-based insights relevant to aerospace engineering, technology management, and capacity-building strategies in developing space ecosystems.
Key Findings
1
A PRISMA 2020 systematic review covering 2000–2025 identifies nine major aerospace research lines and quantifies institutional participation through bibliometric analysis.
2
Key structural gaps involve program continuity, test infrastructure, and mechanisms for transitioning academic prototypes into operational aerospace systems.
3
Peru demonstrates strong analytical and laboratory-level aerospace capabilities, generally corresponding to TRLs 2–5.
4
Regional comparisons using UNOOSA, CelesTrak, and nanosatellite databases contextualize Peru’s orbital activity within South America.
5
The national aerospace ecosystem remains fragmented, with limited system-level integration and flight-qualified developments at TRLs N≥6.
6
The review establishes a technology-assessment baseline for Peru’s aerospace development using systems engineering, TRLs, subsystem integration, and validation environments.
Research Object
Aerospace development in Peru, including scientific infrastructure, suborbital experiments, orbital satellite missions, and contemporary aerospace research
Research Subject
Technology readiness, subsystem integration, validation, and system-level maturity of Peru’s aerospace capabilities
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-02-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest