Improving the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in ecology by expanding measures of success

Совершенствование культуры междисциплинарного сотрудничества в экологии посредством расширения критериев успеха
Simon Goring, Kathleen C. Weathers, Walter K. Dodds, Patricia A. Soranno, Lynn C. Sweet, Kendra Spence Cheruvelil, John S. Kominoski, Janine Rüegg, Alexandra M. Thorn, Ryan M. Utz
2014-01-31

early career researchersecologyinterdisciplinary collaborationmeasures of successresearch outputs
Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to understand ecological systems at scales critical to human decision making. Current reward structures are problematic for scientists engaged in interdisciplinary research, particularly early career researchers, because academic culture tends to value only some research outputs, such as primary‐authored publications. Here, we present a framework for the costs and benefits of collaboration, with a focus on early career stages, and show how the implementation of novel measures of success can help defray the costs of collaboration. Success measures at team and individual levels include research outputs other than publications, including educational outcomes, dataset creation, outreach products (eg blogs or social media), and the application of scientific results to policy or management activities. Promotion and adoption of new measures of success will require concerted effort by both collaborators and their institutions. Expanded measures should better reflect and reward the important work of both disciplinary and interdisciplinary teams at all career stages, and help sustain and stimulate a collaborative culture within ecology.
1
Adopting expanded evaluation criteria requires coordinated action by collaborators and institutions to sustain and stimulate collaborative ecological research.
2
Current academic reward structures overemphasize primary-authored publications, creating disadvantages for scientists—especially early-career researchers—engaged in interdisciplinary ecology.
3
Implementing broader success measures could help offset collaboration costs and better recognize contributions from both disciplinary and interdisciplinary teams.
4
Team- and individual-level success measures should include educational outcomes, dataset creation, outreach products, and applications of research to policy or management.
5
The paper presents a framework for evaluating the costs and benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration, with particular attention to early-career stages.

interdisciplinary collaboration in ecology, particularly involving early-career researchers and disciplinary or interdisciplinary teams

the costs, benefits, and expanded individual- and team-level measures of success for sustaining and rewarding ecological collaboration

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-01-31
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Simon Goring
Kathleen C. Weathers
Walter K. Dodds
Patricia A. Soranno
Lynn C. Sweet
Kendra Spence Cheruvelil
John S. Kominoski
Janine Rüegg
Alexandra M. Thorn
Ryan M. Utz
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%