Revised Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guideline: An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Пересмотренное руководство по описанию хирургических клинических случаев (SCARE): обновление для эпохи искусственного интеллекта
Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al‐Jabir, Ginimol Mathew, Catrin Sohrabi, Rasha Rashid, Thomas Franchi, Maria Nicola, Maliha Agha, Riaz Agha
2025-05-22

AI reporting criteriaDelphi consensusSCARE Guideline 2025artificial intelligencesurgical case reports
INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare and scientific publishing. Reporting guidelines need to be updated to consider this advance.The SCARE Guideline 2025 update introduces a new AI-focused domain to promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in surgical case reports (SCAREs) involving AI. METHODS A Delphi consensus exercise was conducted to update the SCARE guidelines. A panel of 49 surgical and scientific experts was invited to rate proposed new items. In round 1, participants scored each item on a nine-point Likert scale and provided feedback. Items not meeting consensus were revised or discarded. RESULTS A 94% response rate occurred amongst participants (46/49) in the first round. Ratings were analyzed for agreement levels, and consensus was reached on all six proposed AI-related items. A revised SCARE checklist is presented, which incorporates these new AI-related items. Authors are now expected to disclose AI involvement in patient care and manuscript preparation, as exemplified by this article. CONCLUSION The SCARE 2025 guideline provides an up-to-date framework for SCAREs in the era of AI. Through a robust consensus process, we have added specific reporting criteria for AI to ensure that any use of AI in a case report is documented, explained, and discussed concerning bias and ethics. This update will help maintain the quality, transparency, and clinical relevance of case reports, ultimately improving their educational value and trustworthiness for the surgical community.
1
A Delphi consensus exercise engaged 49 surgical and scientific experts, with a 94% first-round response rate (46/49 participants).
2
Authors are expected to disclose AI involvement in patient care and manuscript preparation, including potential bias and ethical considerations.
3
Consensus was reached on all six proposed AI-related reporting items, which were incorporated into the revised SCARE checklist.
4
The SCARE 2025 update adds a dedicated artificial intelligence domain to improve transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in surgical case reports.
5
The updated guideline aims to preserve case-report quality, transparency, clinical relevance, educational value, and trustworthiness in the AI era.

SCARE guidelines for surgical case reports involving artificial intelligence

AI-focused reporting criteria, including transparency, reproducibility, disclosure, bias, and ethical considerations

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-05-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
661
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Ahmed Kerwan
Ahmed Al‐Jabir
Ginimol Mathew
Catrin Sohrabi
Rasha Rashid
Thomas Franchi
Maria Nicola
Maliha Agha
Riaz Agha
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%