Do Democracies Have Different Public Policies than Nondemocracies?
Имеют ли демократии иную государственную политику, чем недемократии?
2004-02-01
SCID: 54.1/mpx3wqgk
Discuss with AI
cross-country comparisonsdemocracypolitical competitionpublic policyvoting theory
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Estimates of democracy's effect on the public sector are obtained from comparisons of 142 countries over the years 1960–90. Based on three tenets of voting theory – that voting mutes policy preference intensity, political power is equally distributed in democracies, and the form of voting processes is important—we expect democracy to affect policies that redistribute, or economically favor the political leadership, or enhance efficiency. We do not find such differences. Instead democracy is correlated with policies that limit competition for public office. Alternative modeling approaches emphasize the degree of competition, and deemphasize the form or even existence of voting processes.
Key Findings
1
Alternative models indicate that the degree of political competition matters more than the form or even existence of voting processes.
2
Democracy is instead correlated with public policies that limit competition for political office.
3
The expected effects of democracy derived from voting theory—muted preference intensity, equal political power, and voting-process design—are not supported by the evidence.
4
Using data from 142 countries between 1960 and 1990, the study finds no systematic democratic–nondemocratic differences in redistributive, leadership-favoring, or efficiency-enhancing public policies.
Research Object
Public policies in 142 countries, comparing democracies and nondemocracies during 1960–1990
Research Subject
The effects of democracy and political competition on policy differences, particularly policies limiting competition for public office
Publication Details
Publication Date
2004-02-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest