Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma

Быстрый скрининг психологического дистресса у мужчин с карциномой предстательной железы
Alice B. Kornblith, Jimmie C. Holland, Howard I. Scher, Andrew Roth, Laure Batel-Copel, Elizabeth Palmer Peabody
1998-05-15

Distress ThermometerHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)prostate carcinomapsychiatric liaison evaluationrapid screening for psychological distress
BACKGROUND: As more oncology care is moved to the outpatient setting, the need for a rapid means for oncologists to identify patients with significant distress has increased. Concurrent with this move has been the pressure to reduce time spent with each patient, adding to the likelihood that a distressed patient will not be recognized and will remain untreated in the current health care environment. METHODS: A pilot program was conducted in a prostate carcinoma oncology clinic to test the feasibility of a two-stage approach that identifies patients in significant distress and refers them for treatment. Two pencil and paper self-report measures were used to detect psychologic distress in patients over the previous week: 1) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and 2) "The Distress Thermometer." Patients who scored above an agreed upon cutoff score on either measure (HADS = 15+; Thermometer = 5+) were referred to the psychiatric liaison in the clinic for evaluation. RESULTS: Compliance in filling out the measures was excellent; only 8 of 121 patients (6.6%) refused. Thirty-one percent of evaluable patients were referred based on elevated scores. Seventeen of 29 patients actually were evaluated. Eight of 17 patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (of Mental Disorders)-IV criteria for a psychiatric disorder. CONCLUSIONS: This approach for rapid screening for distress was acceptable in prostate carcinoma patients, although these older men were reluctant to agree to evaluation and treatment. This simple screening method needs further testing and the identification of barriers on the part of the patient and oncologist that impede the identification of the most distressed patients.
1
A two-stage rapid screening approach using HADS and the Distress Thermometer is feasible in a prostate carcinoma oncology clinic.
2
Authors conclude the simple screening method requires further testing and study of patient and oncologist barriers to identification.
3
Of the 17 referred patients who were evaluated, eight met DSM-IV criteria for a psychiatric disorder.
4
Older men with prostate carcinoma showed reluctance to agree to psychiatric evaluation and treatment despite screening acceptability.
5
Patient compliance completing the pencil-and-paper measures was high, with only 8 of 121 patients (6.6%) refusing.
6
Using cutoffs HADS ≥15 or Thermometer ≥5, 31% of evaluable patients were referred for psychiatric liaison evaluation.

Men with prostate carcinoma attending an outpatient oncology clinic

Feasibility and effectiveness of a rapid two-stage screening approach using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Distress Thermometer to identify psychological distress and refer patients for psychiatric evaluation

Publication Details
Publication Date
1998-05-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Alice B. Kornblith
Jimmie C. Holland
Howard I. Scher
Andrew Roth
Laure Batel-Copel
Elizabeth Palmer Peabody
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%