Estimating fire emissions and disparities in boreal Siberia (1998–2002)

Оценка выбросов от пожаров и различий в бореальной Сибири (1998–2002)
Herman H. Shugart, Paul W. Stackhouse, A. J. Soja, Wesley R. Cofer, А. И. Сухинин, Douglas J. McRae, Susan G. Conard
2004-07-22

Siberian fire emissionsarea burned product (1998–2002)carbon consumption by ecoregiongaseous emissions: CO2 CO CH4 TNMHC and carbonaceous aerosolssoil and peatland smoldering combustion
In the biomass, soils, and peatlands of Siberia, boreal Russia holds one of the largest pools of terrestrial carbon. Because Siberia is located where some of the largest temperature increases are expected to occur under current climate change scenarios, stored carbon has the potential to be released with associated changes in fire regimes. Our concentration is on estimating a wide range of current and potential emissions from Siberia on the basis of three modeled scenarios. An area burned product of Siberia is introduced, which spans from 1998 through 2002. Emissions models are spatially explicit; therefore area burned is extracted from associated ecoregions for each year. Carbon consumption estimates are presented for 23 unique ecoregions across Siberia, which range from 3.4 to 75.4 t C ha −1 for three classes of severity. Total direct carbon emissions range from the traditional scenario estimate of 116 Tg C in 1999 (6.9 M ha burned) to the extreme scenario estimate of 520 Tg C in 2002 (11.2 M ha burned), which are equivalent to 5 and 20%, respectively, of total global carbon emissions from forest and grassland burning. Our results suggest that disparities in the amount of carbon stored in unique ecosystems and the severity of fire events can affect total direct carbon emissions by as much as 50%. Additionally, in extreme fire years, total direct carbon emissions can be 37–41% greater than in normal fire years, owing to increased soil organic matter consumption. Mean standard scenario estimates of CO 2 (555–1031 Tg), CO (43–80 Tg), CH 4 (2.4–4.5 Tg), TNMHC (2.2–4.1 Tg), and carbonaceous aerosols (4.6–8.6 Tg) represent 10, 15, 19, 12 and 26%, respectively, of the global estimates from forest and grassland burning. Accounting for smoldering combustion in soils and peatlands results in increases in CO, CH 4 , and TNMHC and decreases in CO 2 emitted from fire events.
1
An area burned product for Siberia spanning 1998–2002 was introduced and used to extract burned area by ecoregion for each year.
2
Carbon consumption estimates for 23 Siberian ecoregions range from 3.4 to 75.4 t C ha−1 across three fire-severity classes.
3
Disparities in ecosystem carbon storage and fire severity can change total direct carbon emissions by as much as 50%.
4
In extreme fire years, total direct carbon emissions are 37–41% greater than in normal years due to increased soil organic matter consumption; mean standard scenario emissions of CO2, CO, CH4, TNMHC, and carbonaceous aerosols represent 10%, 15%, 19%, 12%, and 26% of global estimates respectively.
5
Including smoldering combustion in soils and peatlands increases emissions of CO, CH4, and TNMHC while decreasing CO2 emitted from fires.
6
Total direct carbon emissions vary widely by scenario: 116 Tg C in 1999 (6.9 Mha burned, traditional) up to 520 Tg C in 2002 (11.2 Mha burned, extreme), equivalent to ~5–20% of global forest and grassland burning emissions.

Fire emissions from burned areas in boreal Siberia (1998–2002), including biomass, soils, and peatlands across 23 ecoregions

Estimation and characterization of current and potential carbon and trace-gas/aerosol emissions (CO2, CO, CH4, TNMHC, carbonaceous aerosols), their variability across ecoregions and fire-severity classes, and disparities due to ecosystem carbon stocks and burn severity

Publication Details
Publication Date
2004-07-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Herman H. Shugart
Paul W. Stackhouse
A. J. Soja
Wesley R. Cofer
А. И. Сухинин
Douglas J. McRae
Susan G. Conard
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%