Real Business Cycles: A New Keynesian Perspective
Реальные деловые циклы: новый кейнсианский взгляд
1995-01-01
SCID: 54.1/n7erathj
Discuss with AI
Economic fluctuationsGeneral equilibriumMarket failureNew Keynesian economicsReal business cycles
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The debate over the source and propagation of economic fluctuations rages as fiercely today as it did 50 years ago in the aftermath of Keynes’s The General Theory and in the midst of the Great Depression. Today, as then, there are two schools of thought. The classical school emphasizes the optimization of private economic actors, the adjustment of relative prices to equate supply and demand, and the efficiency of unfettered markets. The Keynesian school believes that understanding economic fluctuations requires not just studying the intricacies of general equilibrium, but also appreciating the possibility of market failure on a grand scale.
Key Findings
1
Classical analysis emphasizes optimizing private agents, flexible relative-price adjustment, market-clearing, and the efficiency of unfettered markets.
2
The Keynesian perspective argues that explaining fluctuations requires accounting for large-scale market failures in addition to general-equilibrium mechanisms.
3
The paper frames business-cycle theory as a continuing debate between classical and Keynesian explanations of economic fluctuations.
4
The title signals an attempt to interpret real business-cycle issues through a New Keynesian perspective, linking real fluctuations with Keynesian concerns about market imperfections.
Research Object
economic fluctuations
Research Subject
the competing classical and Keynesian explanations of their sources, propagation, and role of market failures versus efficient market adjustment
Publication Details
Publication Date
1995-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest