The Transition of EU Water Policy Towards the Water Framework Directive’s Integrated River Basin Management Paradigm
Переход водной политики ЕС к парадигме интегрированного управления речными бассейнами, закреплённой в Рамочной водной директиве
2018-07-09
SCID: 54.1/nd7v6ghe
Discuss with AI
Common Implementation StrategyEU water policyIntegrated River Basin ManagementWater Framework Directivegood ecological status
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Introduced in 2000 to reform and rationalise water policy and management across the European Union (EU) Member States (MS), the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the EU's flagship legislation on water protection, is widely acknowledged as the embodiment and vessel for the application of the Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM) paradigm. Its ecological objectives, perhaps even more challenging than the prospect of statutory catchment planning itself, were for all EU waters to achieve 'good status' by 2015 (except where exemptions applied) and the prevention of any further deterioration. In support of the upcoming WFD review in 2019, the paper reviews the transition of EU policies that led to the adoption of the WFD, to identify the reasons why the Directive was introduced and what it is trying to deliver, and to place progress with its implementation into context. It further investigates reasons that might have limited the effectiveness of the Directive and contributed to the limited delivery and delays in water quality improvements. Findings reveal that different interpretations on the Directive's objectives and exemptions left unresolved since its negotiation, ambiguity and compromises observed by its Common Implementation Strategy and lack of real support for the policy shift required have all been barriers to the harmonised transposition of the IRBM paradigm, the key to delivering good ecological status. The 2019 WFD review offers a unique opportunity to realign the implementation of the Directive to its initial aspirations and goals.
Key Findings
1
Ambiguities and compromises in the Common Implementation Strategy, combined with insufficient support for the required policy shift, limited effectiveness and delayed water-quality improvements.
2
Divergent interpretations of objectives and exemptions, unresolved since negotiation, hindered harmonised implementation of Integrated River Basin Management.
3
Its core ecological objectives were achieving good status for all EU waters by 2015, subject to exemptions, and preventing further deterioration.
4
The 2019 WFD review provided an opportunity to realign implementation with the Directive’s original aspirations and goals.
5
The Water Framework Directive embodies the EU’s Integrated River Basin Management paradigm and seeks coordinated water-policy reform across Member States.
Research Object
EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and its implementation across EU Member States
Research Subject
The transition toward and effectiveness of the Integrated River Basin Management paradigm, including barriers to harmonised implementation and delivery of good ecological status
Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-07-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest