What did you Really Earn Last Year?: Explaining Measurement Error in Survey Income Data

Что вы действительно заработали в прошлом году?: Объяснение ошибки измерения в данных о доходах в опросах
Matthias Schnetzer, Stefan Angel, Franziska Disslbacher, Stefan Humer
2019-04-29

EU-SILC Austria 2008–2011Owen value decompositionincome measurement errorsocial desirability biassurvey vs administrative records
Summary The paper analyses the sources of income measurement error in surveys with a unique data set. We use the Austrian 2008–2011 waves of the European Union ‘Statistics on income and living conditions’ survey which provide individual information on wages, pensions and unemployment benefits from survey interviews and officially linked administrative records. Thus, we do not have to fall back on complex two-sample matching procedures like related studies. We empirically investigate four sources of measurement error, namely social desirability, sociodemographic characteristics of the respondent, the survey design and the presence of learning effects. We find strong evidence for a social desirability bias in income reporting, whereas the presence of learning effects is mixed and depends on the type of income under consideration. An Owen value decomposition reveals that social desirability is a major explanation of misreporting in wages and pensions, whereas sociodemographic characteristics are most relevant for mismatches in unemployment benefits.
1
Learning effects on reporting accuracy are mixed and depend on the type of income.
2
Owen value decomposition shows social desirability explains most misreporting for wages and pensions.
3
Sociodemographic characteristics are the primary explanation for mismatches in reported unemployment benefits.
4
There is strong evidence of social desirability bias in survey income reporting.
5
Using linked survey and administrative data from Austria (2008–2011) allows direct analysis of income measurement error without two-sample matching.

Individual survey respondents' reported incomes (wages, pensions, unemployment benefits) in the Austrian 2008–2011 EU-SILC linked survey and administrative records

Sources and determinants of measurement error/misreporting in survey income data, specifically social desirability bias, respondent sociodemographic characteristics, survey design, and learning effects, and their contributions by income type

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-04-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Matthias Schnetzer
Stefan Angel
Franziska Disslbacher
Stefan Humer
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%