Collaborative Care Management of Late-Life Depression in the Primary Care Setting
Совместное ведение пациентов пожилого возраста с депрессией в условиях первичной медицинской помощи
2002-12-11
SCID: 54.1/nrs852dr
Discuss with AI
IMPACT interventionProblem Solving Treatmentcollaborative care managementlate-life depressionprimary care
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
CONTEXT: Few depressed older adults receive effective treatment in primary care settings. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) collaborative care management program for late-life depression. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with recruitment from July 1999 to August 2001. SETTING: Eighteen primary care clinics from 8 health care organizations in 5 states. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1801 patients aged 60 years or older with major depression (17%), dysthymic disorder (30%), or both (53%). INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to the IMPACT intervention (n = 906) or to usual care (n = 895). Intervention patients had access for up to 12 months to a depression care manager who was supervised by a psychiatrist and a primary care expert and who offered education, care management, and support of antidepressant management by the patient's primary care physician or a brief psychotherapy for depression, Problem Solving Treatment in Primary Care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months for depression, depression treatments, satisfaction with care, functional impairment, and quality of life. RESULTS: At 12 months, 45% of intervention patients had a 50% or greater reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline compared with 19% of usual care participants (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.71-4.38; P<.001). Intervention patients also experienced greater rates of depression treatment (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.34-3.79; P<.001), more satisfaction with depression care (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 2.66-4.30; P<.001), lower depression severity (range, 0-4; between-group difference, -0.4; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.33; P<.001), less functional impairment (range, 0-10; between-group difference, -0.91; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.64; P<.001), and greater quality of life (range, 0-10; between-group difference, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.79; P<.001) than participants assigned to the usual care group. CONCLUSION: The IMPACT collaborative care model appears to be feasible and significantly more effective than usual care for depression in a wide range of primary care practices.
Key Findings
1
At 12 months, 45% of intervention patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in depressive symptoms, compared with 19% receiving usual care (OR, 3.45; P<.001).
2
Compared with usual care, intervention participants had lower depression severity, less functional impairment, and better quality of life at 12 months.
3
IMPACT increased receipt of depression treatment (OR, 2.98) and satisfaction with depression care (OR, 3.38) relative to usual care.
4
In a randomized trial of 1,801 adults aged 60 years or older, IMPACT collaborative care substantially improved depression outcomes versus usual care.
5
The program provided up to 12 months of care management, psychiatric and primary-care supervision, antidepressant support, education, and Problem Solving Treatment in Primary Care.
Research Object
Older adults aged 60 years or older with late-life depression (major depression, dysthymic disorder, or both) receiving care in primary care settings
Research Subject
Effectiveness of the IMPACT collaborative care management program in reducing depressive symptoms and severity while improving depression treatment, satisfaction with care, functional impairment, and quality of life
Publication Details
Publication Date
2002-12-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest