Risk calculations for conformity assessment in practice

Расчёты рисков на практике при оценке соответствия
Alexandre Allard, Nicolas Fischer, I. M. Smith, P M Harris, Leslie Pendrill
2019-01-01

Bayesian risk evaluationconformity assessmentcustomer riskmeasurement uncertaintyproducer risk
In 2012, the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) published novel guidance on the consideration of measurement uncertainty for decision-making in conformity assessment (JCGM 106:2012). The two situations of making a wrong decision are considered: the risk of accepting a non-conforming item, denoted as the customer risk, and the risk of rejecting a conforming item, denoted as the producer risk. In 2017, the revision of ISO 17025 obliged calibration and testing laboratories to “document the decision rule employed, taking into account the level of risk (such as false accept and false reject and statistical assumptions) associated with the decision rule employed, and apply the decision rule” in the context of the decision made about the conformity of an item. However, JCGM 106:2012 can in some cases be perceived as quite difficult to apply for non-statisticians as it mainly relies on calculations involving probability distributions. In order to facilitate uptake of the methodology of JCGM 106:2012, EURAMET is funding the project EMPIR 17SIP05 “CASoft” (2018 – 2020), involving the National Measurement Institutes from France, Sweden and the UK. The objective is to make the methodology accessible to organisations involved in decision-making in conformity assessment: calibration and testing laboratories, industrialists and regulation authorities. Where the customer or producer are concerned, there are two kinds of risks arising from measurement uncertainty: specific risk which concerns the risk of an incorrect decision for a particular item and global risk which is the risk of an incorrect decision for any item chosen at random. Both kinds of risk may involve prior information, taken into account through a so-called prior probability distribution, introducing the concept of a Bayesian evaluation of the risks. If a calibration and testing laboratory performing the measurement has difficulty accessing prior information, it is likely that the industrialist in control of production processes will have some idea of the quality of the items produced. In this paper, the two problems of estimating the specific and global risks are addressed. The consideration of prior information is also discussed through a practical example as well as the use of software implementing the methodology, which will be made publically available at the end of the project.
1
JCGM 106:2012 defines customer risk as accepting a non-conforming item and producer risk as rejecting a conforming item.
2
Measurement uncertainty creates specific risk for an individual item and global risk for a randomly selected item; both may incorporate prior information through Bayesian evaluation.
3
The 2017 revision of ISO 17025 requires laboratories to document and apply decision rules that account for false-accept and false-reject risks and statistical assumptions.
4
The CASoft project (EMPIR 17SIP05, 2018–2020) aims to make JCGM 106:2012 conformity-assessment methodology accessible to laboratories, industry, and regulatory authorities.
5
The abstract identifies probability-distribution calculations and limited access to prior information as practical barriers to applying the JCGM methodology.

Conformity-assessment decisions involving measurement uncertainty for measured items

Customer and producer risks of incorrect conformity decisions, including specific and global risks and their Bayesian evaluation

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Alexandre Allard
Nicolas Fischer
I. M. Smith
P M Harris
Leslie Pendrill
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%