Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures

Половые различия в предпочтениях партнёров у человека: проверка эволюционных гипотез в 37 культурах
David M. Buss
1989-03-01

cross-cultural evidenceevolutionary hypothesesmate preferencesparental investmentsex differences
Abstract Contemporary mate preferences can provide important clues to human reproductive history. Little is known about which characteristics people value in potential mates. Five predictions were made about sex differences in human mate preferences based on evolutionary conceptions of parental investment, sexual selection, human reproductive capacity, and sexual asymmetries regarding certainty of paternity versus maternity. The predictions centered on how each sex valued earning capacity, ambition— industriousness, youth, physical attractiveness, and chastity. Predictions were tested in data from 37 samples drawn from 33 countries located on six continents and five islands (total N = 10,047). For 27 countries, demographic data on actual age at marriage provided a validity check on questionnaire data. Females were found to value cues to resource acquisition in potential mates more highly than males. Characteristics signaling reproductive capacity were valued more by males than by females. These sex differences may reflect different evolutionary selection pressures on human males and females; they provide powerful cross-cultural evidence of current sex differences in reproductive strategies. Discussion focuses on proximate mechanisms underlying mate preferences, consequences for human intrasexual competition, and the limitations of this study.
1
Demographic data on actual age at marriage from 27 countries were used to check the validity of questionnaire-based preferences; study limitations were also discussed.
2
Findings provided cross-cultural evidence consistent with sex-differentiated reproductive strategies and evolutionary selection pressures.
3
Men valued characteristics signaling reproductive capacity, including youth and physical attractiveness, more highly than women did.
4
The study tested five evolutionary predictions about sex differences in mate preferences across 37 samples from 33 countries, including 10,047 participants.
5
Women valued cues to resource acquisition, including earning capacity and ambition-industriousness, more highly in potential mates than men did.

Human mate preferences across 37 cultural samples

Sex differences in the valuation of earning capacity, ambition–industriousness, youth, physical attractiveness, and chastity, interpreted as differences in reproductive strategies

Publication Details
Publication Date
1989-03-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
David M. Buss
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%