Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review

Понимание образной речи у лиц с расстройством аутистического спектра: метааналитический обзор
Tamara Kalandadze, Courtenay Norbury, Terje Nærland, K Naess
2016-11-29

autism spectrum disordercore language skillsfigurative language comprehensionmeta-analysismetaphor comprehension
We present a meta-analysis of studies that compare figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and in typically developing controls who were matched based on chronological age or/and language ability. A total of 41 studies and 45 independent effect sizes were included based on predetermined inclusion criteria. Group matching strategy, age, types of figurative language, and cross-linguistic differences were examined as predictors that might explain heterogeneity in effect sizes. Overall, individuals with autism spectrum disorder showed poorer comprehension of figurative language than their typically developing peers (Hedges' g = -0.57). A meta-regression analysis showed that group matching strategy and types of figurative language were significantly related to differences in effect sizes, whereas chronological age and cross-linguistic differences were not. Differences between the autism spectrum disorder and typically developing groups were small and nonsignificant when the groups were matched based on the language ability. Metaphors were more difficult to comprehend for individuals with autism spectrum disorder compared with typically developing controls than were irony and sarcasm. Our findings highlight the critical role of core language skills in figurative language comprehension. Interventions and educational programmes designed to improve social communication skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder may beneficially target core language skills in addition to social skills.
1
A meta-analysis of 41 studies and 45 independent effect sizes found poorer figurative-language comprehension in autistic individuals than typically developing controls (Hedges’ g = -0.57).
2
Autism-related differences were small and nonsignificant when participants were matched on language ability, highlighting the importance of core language skills.
3
Chronological age and cross-linguistic differences did not significantly explain heterogeneity in effect sizes.
4
Group matching strategy and figurative-language type significantly explained variation in observed group differences.
5
Interventions targeting social communication may benefit from strengthening core language skills alongside social abilities.
6
Metaphors produced larger comprehension difficulties for autistic individuals than irony and sarcasm.

Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder compared with typically developing controls

Group differences and moderating factors in figurative language comprehension, including the roles of language ability, figurative-language type, chronological age, and cross-linguistic differences

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-11-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Tamara Kalandadze
Courtenay Norbury
Terje Nærland
K Naess
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%