Voluntary Active Euthanasia

Добровольная активная эвтаназия
Dan W. Brock
1992-03-01

euthanasia policypolicy consequencesprofessional debatepublic debatevoluntary active euthanasia
I have cited both good and bad consequences that have been thought\nlikely from a policy change permitting voluntary active euthanasia, and have\ntried to evaluate their likelihood and relative importance. Nevertheless, as\nI noted earlier, reasonable disagreement remains both about the consequences\nof permitting euthanasia and about which of these consequences are more\nimportant. The depth and strength of public and professional debate about\nwhether, all things considered, permitting euthanasia would be desirable or\nundesirable reflects these disagreements. While my own view is that the\nbalance of considerations supports permitting the practice, my principal\npurpose here has been to clarify the main issues.
1
Reasonable disagreement persists about both the likelihood of euthanasia’s consequences and their relative moral importance.
2
The author concludes that, overall, the balance of considerations supports permitting voluntary active euthanasia.
3
The paper evaluates anticipated beneficial and harmful consequences of policies permitting voluntary active euthanasia.
4
The paper’s principal contribution is clarifying the central issues underlying public and professional disagreement over euthanasia policy.

a policy permitting voluntary active euthanasia

the anticipated consequences and overall desirability of permitting voluntary active euthanasia

Publication Details
Publication Date
1992-03-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Dan W. Brock
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%