Neural Correlates of Reach Errors
Нейронные корреляты ошибок при выполнении движений достижения
2005-10-26
SCID: 54.1/p2hc5au7
Discuss with AI
execution errorsfunctional magnetic resonance imaginginternal modelsreach errorstarget errors
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Reach errors may be broadly classified into errors arising from unpredictable changes in target location, called target errors, and errors arising from miscalibration of internal models (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback or a force field alters limb dynamics), called execution errors. Execution errors may be caused by miscalibration of dynamics (e.g., when a force field alters limb dynamics) or by miscalibration of kinematics (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback). Although all types of errors lead to similar on-line corrections, we found that the motor system showed strong trial-by-trial adaptation in response to random execution errors but not in response to random target errors. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a compatible robot to study brain regions involved in processing each kind of error. Both kinematic and dynamic execution errors activated regions along the central and the postcentral sulci and in lobules V, VI, and VIII of the cerebellum, making these areas possible sites of plastic changes in internal models for reaching. Only activity related to kinematic errors extended into parietal area 5. These results are inconsistent with the idea that kinematics and dynamics of reaching are computed in separate neural entities. In contrast, only target errors caused increased activity in the striatum and the posterior superior parietal lobule. The cerebellum and motor cortex were as strongly activated as with execution errors. These findings indicate a neural and behavioral dissociation between errors that lead to switching of behavioral goals and errors that lead to adaptation of internal models of limb dynamics and kinematics.
Key Findings
1
Both kinematic and dynamic execution errors activated central and postcentral sulci and cerebellar lobules V, VI, and VIII, implicating these regions in internal-model plasticity.
2
Kinematic errors additionally recruited parietal area 5, arguing against separate neural entities for computing reaching kinematics and dynamics.
3
Reach errors separate into target errors from unpredictable target changes and execution errors from miscalibrated internal kinematic or dynamic models.
4
Target errors selectively increased activity in the striatum and posterior superior parietal lobule, revealing a neural and behavioral dissociation between goal switching and internal-model adaptation.
5
The motor system adapted strongly trial-by-trial to random execution errors but showed little adaptation to random target errors, despite similar online corrections.
Research Object
human reaching motor system and its neural circuits
Research Subject
neural and behavioral processing and adaptation to target, kinematic, and dynamic reach errors
Publication Details
Publication Date
2005-10-26
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest