An Evaluation of the Multifactorial Model of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment

Оценка многофакторной модели когнитивных нарушений, связанных с раком
Kate Oppegaard, Samantha Mayo, Terri S. Armstrong, Kord M. Kober, Joaquin A. Anguera, Fay Wright, Jon D. Levine, Yvette P. Conley, Steven M. Paul, Bruce A. Cooper, Christine Miaskowski
2023-04-24

attentional function indexcancer-related cognitive impairmentco-occurring symptomsmultifactorial modelstructural regression
BACKGROUND: Up to 45% of patients report cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). A variety of characteristics are associated with the occurrence and/or severity of CRCI. However, an important gap in knowledge of risk factors for CRCI is the relative contribution of each factor. The multifactorial model of cancer-related cognitive impairment (MMCRCI) is a conceptual model of CRCI that can be used to evaluate the strength of relationships between various factors and CRCI. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to use structural regression methods to evaluate the MMCRCI using data from a large sample of outpatients receiving chemotherapy ( n = 1,343). Specifically, the relationships between self-reported CRCI and four MMCRCI concepts (i.e., social determinants of health, patient-specific factors, treatment factors, and co-occurring symptoms) were examined. The goals were to determine how well the four concepts predicted CRCI and determine the relative contribution of each concept to deficits in perceived cognitive function. METHODS: This study is part of a larger, longitudinal study that evaluated the symptom experience of oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Adult patients were diagnosed with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecological, or lung cancer; had received chemotherapy within the preceding 4 weeks; were scheduled to receive at least two additional cycles of chemotherapy; were able to read, write, and understand English; and gave written informed consent. Self-reported CRCI was assessed using the attentional function index. Available study data were used to define the latent variables. RESULTS: On average, patients were 57 years of age, college educated, and with a mean Karnofsky Performance Status score of 80. Of the four concepts evaluated, whereas co-occurring symptoms explained the largest amount of variance in CRCI, treatment factors explained the smallest amount of variance. A simultaneous structural regression model that estimated the joint effect of the four exogenous latent variables on the CRCI latent variable was not significant. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that testing individual components of the MMCRCI may provide useful information on the relationships among various risk factors, as well as refinements of the model. In terms of risk factors for CRCI, co-occurring symptoms may be more significant than treatment factors, patient-specific factors, and/or social determinants of health in patients receiving chemotherapy.
1
Co-occurring symptoms explained the largest proportion of variance in perceived cognitive function among the four model concepts.
2
The findings assess the relative contribution of multiple domains rather than treating cancer-related cognitive impairment as attributable to a single factor.
3
The model examined four contributors to self-reported cognitive impairment: social determinants of health, patient-specific factors, treatment factors, and co-occurring symptoms.
4
The study evaluated the Multifactorial Model of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment using structural regression methods in 1,343 outpatients receiving chemotherapy.
5
Treatment factors explained the smallest proportion of variance in cancer-related cognitive impairment.

Cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy

The relative contributions and predictive relationships of social determinants of health, patient-specific factors, treatment factors, and co-occurring symptoms to self-reported cognitive impairment

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-04-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
12
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Kate Oppegaard
Samantha Mayo
Terri S. Armstrong
Kord M. Kober
Joaquin A. Anguera
Fay Wright
Jon D. Levine
Yvette P. Conley
Steven M. Paul
Bruce A. Cooper
Christine Miaskowski
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%