Influence of Prefabricated Post Material on Restored Teeth: Fracture Strength and Stress Distribution
Влияние материала сборного штифта на восстановленные зубы: прочность при переломе и распределение напряжений
2006-01-01
SCID: 54.1/p7xxqq4s
Discuss with AI
finite element analysisfracture strengthglass fiber postsprefabricated intraradicular postsstainless steel posts
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
AIMS: This work studied how prefabricated intraradicular post material affects the mechanical performance of restored teeth. The effect of using two different materials (glass fiber and stainless steel) with significantly different elastic moduli was studied. METHODS: A combined theoretical and experimental method was used: first, an experimental fracture strength test was performed on 60 extracted human maxillary central incisors. The teeth were decoronated, treated endodontically and restored, 30 with glass fiber posts and 30 with stainless steel posts. The data were recorded and the results compared using an ANOVA test. Then, the finite element technique was used to develop a model of the restored tooth. For both post systems, the model allowed for the study of stress distribution patterns on the restored tooth under external loads. RESULTS: For teeth restored with stainless steel posts, a significantly lower failure load was found, as compared with those teeth restored with glass fiber posts (520 N versus 803 N). The estimated distributions confirmed a worse mechanical performance on teeth restored using stainless steel posts, with a high stress concentration due to the significant difference between the elastic moduli of the steel and the surrounding materials. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, post systems, where the elastic modulus of the post is similar to that of dentin and core, have a better biomechanical performance.
Key Findings
1
Finite element analysis showed greater stress concentration around stainless steel posts because their elastic modulus differs substantially from surrounding dentin and core materials.
2
Glass fiber post-restored teeth showed significantly higher fracture strength than stainless steel post-restored teeth (803 N versus 520 N).
3
Post systems with elastic moduli similar to dentin and core materials demonstrated better biomechanical performance within the study’s limitations.
4
The combined experimental and computational results indicate poorer mechanical performance for teeth restored with stainless steel posts.
Research Object
Endodontically treated human maxillary central incisors restored with glass fiber or stainless steel prefabricated intraradicular posts
Research Subject
The influence of prefabricated post material and elastic-modulus mismatch on fracture strength, stress distribution, and biomechanical performance of restored teeth under external loads
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest