The Limits of Influence: Psychokinesis and the Philosophy Of Science.
Пределы влияния: психокинез и философия науки
1989-03-01
SCID: 54.1/pnepwbtv
Discuss with AI
consciousness and intentionalityparapsychologyphilosophy of sciencepsychokinesisqualitative evidence
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Levitations, materializations, healings, earthquake-like rocking. evidence of large scale spontaneous psychokinesis through history is a neglected and unjustly maligned aspect of the science of parapsychology. In The Limits of Influence Stephen E. Braude argues that the familiar card-guessing experiments and statistical proofs' of PSI will never elicit important or revealing facts about the phenomena. Instead he turns our attention to the substantial (if sometimes bizarre) qualitative evidence. Not only does this pose no threat to the fabric of science, but it holds out hope for substantial progress in psychology, as well as in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mind which have so far have failed to solve fundamental problems of consciousness and intentionality. This book should be of interest to students and teachers of philosophy and psychology.
Key Findings
1
Acknowledging qualitative psychokinetic evidence poses no threat to science and could advance psychology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of mind in addressing consciousness and intentionality.
2
Historical qualitative evidence (levitations, materializations, healings, earthquake-like rocking) indicates large-scale spontaneous psychokinesis that is neglected by parapsychology.
3
Standard card-guessing experiments and statistical 'proofs' of psi are argued to be incapable of revealing important or revealing facts about psychokinetic phenomena.
4
Substantial qualitative cases should be the focus for progress, rather than quantitative experimental paradigms.
Research Object
Large-scale spontaneous psychokinesis phenomena (levitations, materializations, healings, earthquake-like rocking) as documented in parapsychology
Research Subject
Assessment of the epistemic limits of conventional PSI laboratory methods (e.g., card-guessing/statistical tests) versus qualitative historical evidence, and the implications of such large-scale psychokinetic phenomena for psychology and the philosophy of science/mind
Publication Details
Publication Date
1989-03-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest