Conceptualization and Coordination of Competing Discourses: The Theory of Cultural Policy
Концептуализация и координация конкурирующих дискурсов: теория культурной политики
2021-12-21
SCID: 54.1/prtr95pk
Discuss with AI
competing discoursesconceptual categorizationcultural policyculturologistsdecentralization of culture management
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The article explores the process of formation of competing discourses by different subjects of cultural policy, revealing deep discrepancies in the strategies of their interaction and the need to develop new models. There is noted the multi-subject nature of cultural policy and the decentralization of the culture management system, as well as the importance of the scientific and analytical justifications and conventional principles that ensure coordinated schematization of actions in the context of a complex and dynamically transforming reality. This leads to the increasing importance of the role of the expert scientific community of culturologists, who provide conceptual categorization and translation of perceptual and empirical data to the logical and conceptual level based on modern methodological principles of research, as well as interpretation that is inextricably present in the unfolding of meanings and the perception of institutional and everyday events. This justification is relevant and in demand in the situation of openness and permanent incompleteness of cultural and civilizational changes, plurality of cultures and socio-cultural diversity, since it is aimed at coordinating conceptual constants and value orientations discursively transmitted by different subjects of cultural policy. Revealing the ambivalence of discourses that focus both on the development and modernization, and the revitalization of archaism, on mythologization, the author speaks about the retention of the value-semantic core and the integrity of culture, which allows for alternative design practices and helps to overcome information pressure factors and reduce the risks of digital coding of public consciousness. For the first time, the article offers a systematization of the factors accompanying the process of making managerial decisions that affect the state of culture in society. Critical and reflexive thinking of culturologists provides a high level of expertise and conceptualization of discourses of cultural policy. The article raises the question of the expanding prospects for the inclusion of discourses of various subjects of cultural policy in the digital environment and the space of mass media.
Key Findings
1
Ambivalent discourses simultaneously promote development/modernization and revitalization/mythologization, while retention of value-semantic core preserves cultural integrity.
2
Coordinating conceptual constants and value orientations helps manage plurality of cultures, socio-cultural diversity, and permanent incompleteness of civilizational change.
3
Critical and reflexive thinking of culturologists raises expertise level and aids conceptualization of cultural policy discourses.
4
Cultural policy is multi-subject and decentralized, producing competing discourses with deep strategic discrepancies among actors.
5
Expert community of culturologists plays an increasing role in conceptual categorization, translation of empirical data, and interpretation of institutional and everyday events.
6
Scientific and analytical justifications and conventional principles are essential to coordinate actions amid complex, dynamic cultural transformations.
7
Systematization of factors influencing managerial decisions affecting culture is offered for the first time in this article.
8
There are expanding prospects and challenges for inclusion of varied cultural policy discourses within digital environments and mass media spaces.
Research Object
Competing discourses produced by different subjects of cultural policy within the cultural policy system
Research Subject
Processes and mechanisms of conceptualization, coordination, and interaction of these competing discourses (including role of expert culturologists, decentralization, conceptual categorization, value-orientation alignment, and effects in digital/media environments) that shape managerial decision-making and cultural integrity
Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-12-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest