Nivolumab for Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma After Failure of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Extended Follow-Up of the Multicohort Single-Arm Phase II CheckMate 205 Trial

Ниволумаб при рецидивирующей/рефрактерной классической лимфоме Ходжкина после неудачи аутологичной трансплантации гемопоэтических клеток: расширенное наблюдение в рамках многохортового однораменного исследования CheckMate 205 II фазы
Philippe Armand, Andreas Engert, Anas Younes, Michelle A. Fanale, Armando Santoro, Pier Luigi Zinzani, John M. Timmerman, Graham P. Collins, Radhakrishnan Ramchandren, Jonathon B. Cohen, Jan Paul de Boer, John Kuruvilla, Kerry J. Savage, Marek Trněný, Margaret A. Shipp, Kazunobu Kato, Anne Sumbul, Benedetto Farsaci, Stephen M. Ansell
2018-03-27

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantationCheckMate 205Classic Hodgkin lymphomaNivolumabProgrammed death-1 checkpoint inhibition
Purpose Genetic alterations causing overexpression of programmed death-1 ligands are near universal in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Nivolumab, a programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory cHL after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in initial analyses of one of three cohorts from the CheckMate 205 study of nivolumab for cHL. Here, we assess safety and efficacy after extended follow-up of all three cohorts. Methods This multicenter, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory cHL after auto-HCT treatment failure into cohorts by treatment history: brentuximab vedotin (BV)-naïve (cohort A), BV received after auto-HCT (cohort B), and BV received before and/or after auto-HCT (cohort C). All patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate per independent radiology review committee. Results Overall, 243 patients were treated; 63 in cohort A, 80 in cohort B, and 100 in cohort C. After a median follow-up of 18 months, 40% continued to receive treatment. The objective response rate was 69% (95% CI, 63% to 75%) overall and 65% to 73% in each cohort. Overall, the median duration of response was 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.2 to 20.3 months), and median progression-free survival was 14.7 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 18.5 months). Of 70 patients treated past conventional disease progression, 61% of those evaluable had stable or further reduced target tumor burdens. The most common grade 3 to 4 drug-related adverse events were lipase increases (5%), neutropenia (3%), and ALT increases (3%). Twenty-nine deaths occurred; none were considered treatment related. Conclusion With extended follow-up, responses to nivolumab were frequent and durable. Nivolumab seems to be associated with a favorable safety profile and long-term benefits across a broad spectrum of patients with relapsed/refractory cHL.
1
Among evaluable patients treated beyond conventional disease progression, 61% had stable or further reduced target tumor burdens.
2
In 243 patients with relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma after auto-HCT failure, nivolumab achieved a 69% objective response rate overall.
3
Nivolumab showed a favorable safety profile; the most common grade 3–4 treatment-related events were lipase increases, neutropenia, and ALT increases, and no deaths were treatment related.
4
Objective response rates were consistent across treatment-history cohorts, ranging from 65% to 73% regardless of prior brentuximab vedotin exposure.
5
Responses were durable, with a median duration of response of 16.6 months and median progression-free survival of 14.7 months.

Relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

The long-term safety, objective response, durability of response, and progression-free survival associated with nivolumab across treatment-history cohorts

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-03-27
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Philippe Armand
Andreas Engert
Anas Younes
Michelle A. Fanale
Armando Santoro
Pier Luigi Zinzani
John M. Timmerman
Graham P. Collins
Radhakrishnan Ramchandren
Jonathon B. Cohen
Jan Paul de Boer
John Kuruvilla
Kerry J. Savage
Marek Trněný
Margaret A. Shipp
Kazunobu Kato
Anne Sumbul
Benedetto Farsaci
Stephen M. Ansell
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%