Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission

Мужской пол выявлен в глобальном метаанализе COVID-19 как фактор риска смерти и поступления в отделение интенсивной терапии
Hannah Peckham, Nina M. de Gruijter, Charles Raine, Anna Radziszewska, Coziana Ciurtin, Lucy R. Wedderburn, Elizabeth C. Rosser, Kate Webb, Claire T. Deakin
2020-12-09

COVID-19ITU admissionSARS-CoV-2global meta-analysissex differences in mortality
Anecdotal evidence suggests that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, exhibits differences in morbidity and mortality between sexes. Here, we present a meta-analysis of 3,111,714 reported global cases to demonstrate that, whilst there is no difference in the proportion of males and females with confirmed COVID-19, male patients have almost three times the odds of requiring intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06, 3.92) and higher odds of death (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.31, 1.47) compared to females. With few exceptions, the sex bias observed in COVID-19 is a worldwide phenomenon. An appreciation of how sex is influencing COVID-19 outcomes will have important implications for clinical management and mitigation strategies for this disease.
1
A global meta-analysis of 3,111,714 COVID-19 cases found no difference between males and females in the proportion of confirmed infections.
2
Male COVID-19 patients had nearly threefold higher odds of intensive treatment unit admission than females (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06–3.92).
3
Male patients had higher odds of death than female patients (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.31–1.47).
4
Sex-related differences in COVID-19 outcomes have implications for clinical management and disease mitigation strategies.
5
The male bias in severe COVID-19 outcomes was observed worldwide, with few exceptions.

COVID-19 patients and confirmed cases

Sex differences in COVID-19 outcomes, specifically the risks of intensive treatment unit admission and death

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-12-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Hannah Peckham
Nina M. de Gruijter
Charles Raine
Anna Radziszewska
Coziana Ciurtin
Lucy R. Wedderburn
Elizabeth C. Rosser
Kate Webb
Claire T. Deakin
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%